Who Bears the Burden of a Pandemic? Covid-19 and the Transfer of Risk to Digital Platform Workers
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3758596 |
|---|---|
| Autores | P Tubaro (0000-0002-1215-9145, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, autor de correspondencia), Antonio A Casilli (0000-0003-2025-1627, SID-SES Department, Interdisciplinary Institute for Innovation (i3), Telecom Paris /Polytechnic Institute of Paris, Paris, France) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 68 |
| Número | 8 |
| Páginas | 961-982 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00027642211066027 |
| OpenAlex | W3205682931 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
| Referencias citadas | 33 |
In this paper, we analyze the recessionary effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on digital platform workers. The crisis has been described as a great work-from-home experiment, with platform ecosystems presenting as its most advanced form. Our analysis differentiates the direct (health) and indirect (economic) risks incurred by workers in order to critically assess the portrayal of platforms as buffers against crisis-induced layoffs. We submit that platform-mediated labor may eventually increase precarity, without necessarily reducing health risks for workers. Our argument is based on a comparison of the three main categories of platform work-"on-demand labor" (gigs such as delivery and transportation), "online labor" (tasks performed remotely, such as data annotation), and "social networking labor" (content generation and moderation). We discuss the strategies that platforms deploy to transfer risk from clients onto workers, thus deepening existing power imbalances between them. These results question the problematic equivalence between work-from-home and platform labor. Instead of attaining the advantages of the former in terms of direct and indirect risk mitigation, an increasing number of platformized jobs drift toward high economic and insuppressible health risks
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Disease · Environmental health · Geography · Outbreak · Pandemic · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Medicine · Sharing Economy and Platforms · Virology
Tracing flows across a behti ganga and a khada nala
Digital and Disembedded? Questioning the Territorial Embeddedness of Local Digital Platforms
Work on through the storm
Platform capitalism and the erosion of public care
Social risks, platform economy, and welfare regime
Taming the algorithm
Sex Workers, Online Platforms, and Deplatforming
Digital work platform
Deeply embedded wages
Future Shocks
Behind the Screen
How many jobs can be done at home?
The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities
Digital Labor
Digital labour and development
Humans as a Service
The global gig economy
Dis)embeddedness and (de)commodification
Managing the Covid-19 pandemic through individual responsibility
Double Lives
After the Gig
Regulate, replicate, and resist – the conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism
Value in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet
Distancing Bonus Or Downscaling Loss? The Changing Livelihood of Us Online Workers in Times of Covid‐19
Uberland
Neutralization theory and the denial of risk
The trainer, the verifier, the imitator
En attendant les robots
Risk Society
Modernity and Self-Identity
Free Labor
A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms
The Side Hustle Safety Net
Disembedded or Deeply Embedded? A Multi-Level Network Analysis of Online Labour Platforms
What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 9 |