Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Productivity Commission

A different engine for law reform

Datos Bibliográficos

ID14970880
AutoresLyria Bennett Moses (0000-0003-2571-1469, UNSW Sydney), Nicola Gollan (UNSW Sydney), Kirsten Tranter (0000-0003-1683-2939, Griffith University, autor de correspondencia), Kieran Tranter
Año2015
Volumen24
Número4
Páginas657-686
Fecha de publicación2015-10-02
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaGriffith Law Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1038-3441 • E-ISSN: 1839-4205
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10383441.2015.1099178
OpenAlexW2318969260
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas18

This empirical study analyses the extent to which the Productivity Commission (Commission) relies on different types of evidence in formulating recommendations in a sample of reports. It goes deeper than traditional citation analysis; rather than classifying and counting all material cited in each sample report, it includes only citations that influenced the final recommendations. The findings, which run counter to the rhetoric employed in relation to the Commission's work, reveal the extent to which the Commission relies on non-quantitative forms of evidence, including bare assertions, personal experience, and logical and legal arguments, particularly in reports addressing broader questions of social policy. It concludes with a discussion of the significance of these findings, linking them to Graycar's critique of law reform commissions. As such, it provides a more accurate, but still preliminary, basis for understanding the Commission's methods than that otherwise appearing in the discourse surrounding the Commission's work

Citation · Commission · Data mining · Economics · Law reform · Political science · Productivity · Relation (database · Rhetoric · Sample (material · Sociology · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal Education and Practice Innovations

  • Oligopolist Speech and the Public Interest in Pharmaceutical Patent Law Reform

    Open Access•Chris Dent, Yvonne Haigh•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2018

  • Investigating the production and communication of evidence by the Productivity Commission

    Open Access•Celia Green, George Carey et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2020

  • The machine runs itself’

    Vincent Goding, Kirsten Tranter•Griffith Law Review•2021

  • Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again

    Reg Graycar•Theoretical Inquiries in Law•2012

  • Jamais deux sans trois ... Once Reform, Twice Commission, Thrice Law

    Open Access•Roderick A Macdonald•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2007

  • Citing Outside the Law Reports

    Russell Smyth•Griffith Law Review•2009

  • Did You Know

    Open Access•Becky Batagol, Melissa Castan•Alternative Law Journal•2012

  • The Most-Cited Articles from The Yale Law Journal

    Fred R Shapiro•The Yale Law Journal•1991

  • State Supreme Courts

    Lawrence M Friedman, Robert A Kagan et al.•Stanford Law Review•1981

  • Citations to Authority in Supreme Court Opinions

    Open Access•Charles A Johnson•Law & Policy•1985

  • Ecology and Culture in the Communication of Precedent Among State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970

    Open Access•Peter Harris•Law & Society Review•1985

Citas por año0,38
Intervalo de citas2018 - 2021 (4)
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae