The machine runs itself’
Law is technology and Australian embryo and human cloning law
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 14970884 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Vincent Goding (0000-0003-0796-8375, University of the Sunshine Coast), Kirsten Tranter (0000-0003-1683-2939, School of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 30 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 240-269 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-04-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Griffith Law Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1038-3441 • E-ISSN: 1839-4205 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10383441.2021.1901356 |
| OpenAlex | W3158625331 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 44 |
Technology law scholarship has a tendency towards the dramatic. Technology causes disruption. Law must catch-up; it must ensure potential benefits from technology and avoid potential harms. There are even concerns that law, as an organiser of human life, is itself becoming eclipsed by forms of technological management. What is often not focused on is the practical process through which concerns about technology become transmuted into legal forms within specific jurisdictions. This paper examines the 23 years of Australian law concerning embryos and human cloning. Inspired by Carl Schmitt’s criticism of modernity’s political institutions and the laws they produce, what is identified is a machine that runs itself. It is shown to be a highly automated process whereby technical experts manage competing values. Rather than law regulating technology or technology regulating law; the Australian study suggests that law and its making, is technological
Commercial law · Human cloning · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Technological evolution · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts
Rhetoric, power and legitimacy
The Legal Landscape Following Technological Change
Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism
Regulating stem cell research and human cloning in an Australian context
Hearing community voices
Regulating stem-cell research and human cloning in an Australian context
Agents of Change
The Speculative Jurisdiction
The Productivity Commission
Echo and Mirror
Disrupting Technology Disrupting Law
Germany’s salvation’
The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations(1929)
The Plight of European Jurisprudence
The crisis of parliamentary democracy
Fear, Technology, and the State
The Rise of the Homme Machine
To be human, nonetheless, remains a decision
Technologies of the law/ law as a technology
German social theory and the hidden face of technology
Replicating Our Bodies, Losing Our Selves
Coffee Politicians Does Create
The Jargon of Exception-On Schmitt, Agamben and the Absence of Political Society
| Altamente citado | No |
|---|