Setting priorities for zinc-related health research to reduce children’s disease burden worldwide

An application of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative’s research priority-setting method

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15092116
AutoresKendall H Brown (0000-0001-6498-3120, Nutrition 21 (United States), autor de correspondencia), Kenneth H Brown, Sonja Y Hess (0000-0002-4661-277X, University of California, Davis), Erick Boy (0000-0002-0271-1725, Nutrition International), Rosalind S Gibson (0000-0002-1738-7593, University of Otago), Susan Horton (0000-0002-9243-4767, Wilfrid Laurier University), Saskia Osendarp (0000-0002-3847-5584, Unilever (Netherlands)), Saskia J Osendarp, Fernando Sempértegui (Central University of Ecuador), Roger Shrimpton, Igor Rudan (0000-0001-6993-6884, University of Split)
Año2009
Volumen12
Número3
Páginas389-396
Fecha de publicación2009-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPublic Health Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1368980008002188
PMID18426636
OpenAlexW2161126258
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas13

Objective To make the best use of limited resources for supporting health-related research to reduce child mortality, it is necessary to apply a suitable method to rank competing research options. The Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) developed a new methodology for setting health research priorities. To broaden experience with this priority-setting technique, we applied the method to rank possible research priorities concerning the control of Zn deficiency. Although Zn deficiency is not generally recognized as a direct cause of child mortality, recent research indicates that it predisposes children to an increased incidence and severity of several of the major direct causes of morbidity and mortality. Design Leading experts in the field of Zn research in child health were identified and invited to participate in a technical working group (TWG) to establish research priorities. The individuals were chosen to represent a wide range of expertise in Zn nutrition. The seven TWG members submitted a total of ninety research options, which were then consolidated into a final list of thirty-one research options categorized by the type of resulting intervention. Results The identified priorities were dominated by research investment options targeting Zn supplementation, and were followed by research on Zn fortification, general aspects of Zn nutrition, dietary modification and other new interventions. Conclusions In general, research options that aim to improve the efficiency of an already existing intervention strategy received higher priority scores. Challenges identified during the implementation of the methodology and suggestions to modify the priority-setting procedures are discussed

Child health · Child mortality · Environmental health · Family medicine · Implementation research · Intervention (counseling · Population · Psychological intervention · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Medicine · Nursing · Trace Elements in Health