Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Consumer involvement in dietary guideline development

Opinions from European stakeholders

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15095479
AutoresKerry A Brown (0000-0002-6803-5336, University of Surrey, autor de correspondencia), Maria Hermoso (0000-0002-7920-6567, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Lada Timotijevic (0000-0002-3154-0048, University of Surrey), Julie Barnett (0000-0001-5740-0863, Brunel University of London), Inger Therese L Lillegaard, Inger Therese Lillegaard (University of Oslo), Irena Rehurkova (National Institute of Public Health), Ainhoa Larrañaga (European Food Information Council), Azra Lončarević-Srmić (Brain Tumour Charity), Lene F Andersen (0000-0003-0236-1558, University of Oslo), Jiri Ruprich (0000-0002-3429-5252, National Institute of Public Health), Laura Fernández-Celemin, Laura Fernández-Celemı́n (European Food Information Council), Monique M Raats (0000-0002-8419-0600), Monique Raats (0000-0002-8057-2783, University of Surrey)
Año2013
Volumen16
Número5
Páginas769-776
Fecha de publicación2013-05-01
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPublic Health Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1368980012005125
PMID23182406
OpenAlexW2167780943
IdiomaNL
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas29

Objective The involvement of consumers in the development of dietary guidelines has been promoted by national and international bodies. Yet, few best practice guidelines have been established to assist with such involvement. Design Qualitative semi-structured interviews explored stakeholders’ beliefs about consumer involvement in dietary guideline development. Setting Interviews were conducted in six European countries: the Czech Republic, Germany, Norway, Serbia, Spain and the UK. Subjects Seventy-seven stakeholders were interviewed. Stakeholders were grouped as government, scientific advisory body, professional and academic, industry or non-government organisations. Response rate ranged from 45 % to 95 %. Results Thematic analysis was conducted with the assistance of NVivo qualitative software. Analysis identified two main themes: (i) type of consumer involvement and (ii) pros and cons of consumer involvement. Direct consumer involvement (e.g. consumer organisations) in the decision-making process was discussed as a facilitator to guideline communication towards the end of the process. Indirect consumer involvement (e.g. consumer research data) was considered at both the beginning and the end of the process. Cons to consumer involvement included the effect of vested interests on objectivity; consumer disinterest; and complications in terms of time, finance and technical understanding. Pros related to increased credibility and trust in the process. Conclusions Stakeholders acknowledged benefits to consumer involvement during the development of dietary guidelines, but remained unclear on the advantage of direct contributions to the scientific content of guidelines. In the absence of established best practice, clarity on the type and reasons for consumer involvement would benefit all actors

Business · CLARITY · Consumer confidence index · Credibility · Facilitator · Government (linguistics · Guideline · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Clinical practice guidelines implementation · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Marketing

  • Are dietary guidelines sensible to consumers

    Open Access•Carmen Pérez-Rodrigo, Carmen Pérez‐Rodrigo et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2013

  • Lay perspectives

    Open Access•Vikki Entwistle, V A Entwistle et al.•BMJ•1998

  • Consumer involvement in health research

    Open Access•Jonathan Boote, Rosemary Telford et al.•Health Policy•2002

  • The snakes and ladders of user involvement

    Open Access•Jonathan Tritter, Jonathan Quetzal Tritter et al.•Health Policy•2006

  • Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care

    Open Access•Mike J Crawford, Deborah Rutter et al.•BMJ•2002

  • Stakeholder engagement in food risk management

    Open Access•John Walls, Gene Rowe et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • Public engagement in research funding

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Dee Rawsthorne et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2010

  • What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study

    Open Access•Rosemary Telford, Jonathan D Boote et al.•Health Expectations•2004

  • Health consumer and patients' organizations in Europe

    Open Access•Rob Baggott, Rudolf Forster•Health Expectations•2008

  • Food and trust in Australia

    Open Access•John Coveney•Public Health Nutrition•2008

  • A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

    Sherry R Arnstein•Journal of the American Institute…•1969

  • A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Lynn J Frewer•Science Technology & Human Values•2005

  • Food, self and identity

    Open Access•Claude Fischler•Social Science Information•1988

  • The Reality of Experts and the Imagined Lay Person

    Open Access•Alessandro Maranta, Michael Guggenheim et al.•Acta Sociologica•2003

Citas por año0,08
Intervalo de citas2013 - 2013 (1)
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae