Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Comparing the Effectiveness of Two Communication Formats on Visitors’ Understanding of Nanotechnology

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15322897
AutoresDoris Lewalter (0000-0002-4705-5645, Technical University of Munich, autor de correspondencia), Claudia Geyer (Technical University of Munich), Katrin Neubauer (Technical University of Munich)
Año2014
Volumen17
Número2
Páginas159-176
Fecha de publicación2014-07-03
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaVisitor Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1064-5578 • E-ISSN: 1934-7715
EditorialRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10645578.2014.945345
OpenAlexW2087758934
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas23

The authors investigated the results of the Europe-wide initiative NanoToTouch, which aims to create innovative environments in science museums to encourage public understanding of nanotechnology and nanotechnological research. The concepts of civic scientific literacy and expert–layperson communication formed the theoretical framework of the study. Two kinds of communication formats, which varied in the degree to which presentations were individualized for visitors, were established and investigated in five museums and science centers in four countries. The findings from 522 visitors indicate (a) a positive response from visitors regarding both formats with some differences between them; (b) an increase in visitors’ self-perceived level of knowledge, which was considerably higher for nanotechnological content than for nanotechnological research; and (c) a predominance of situational aspects, compared to personal variables, influencing visitors’ learning. Results are discussed in terms of an effective implementation of these communication formats in museums

Layperson · Literacy · Pedagogy · Political science · Science education · Scientific Literacy · Situational ethics · Animal and Plant Science Education · Conferences and Exhibitions Management · Museums and Cultural Heritage · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Visit Motivation as Part of Visitors’ Personal Context in a Science Museum

    Siëlle Phelan, Siëlle Gramser et al.•Visitor Studies•2020

  • Linguistic Features of Public Service Encounters

    Open Access•Steffen Eckhard, Laurin Friedrich•Journal of Public Administration…•2024

  • Interest development, self-related information processing, and practice

    Open Access•K Ann Renninger, Suzanne E Hidi et al.•Theory Into Practice•2022

  • Using Language

    Open Access•Herbert H Clark•Using Language•1996

  • Revisiting the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Generation of Interest

    K Ann Renninger, Suzanne Hidi•Educational Psychologist•2011

  • The Expertise Reversal Effect

    Slava Kalyuga, Paul Ayres et al.•Educational Psychologist•2003

  • Research on Interest in Science

    Andreas Krapp, Manfred Prenzel•International Journal of Science…•2011

  • Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology

    Open Access•Dan M Kahan, Donald Braman et al.•Nature Nanotechnology•2009

  • A Short Review of School Field Trips

    John Dewitt, Jennifer DeWitt et al.•Visitor Studies•2008

  • The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome

    Open Access•Gregory Arief D Liem, Arief Darmanegara Liem et al.•Contemporary Educational Psychology•2008

  • Self-Efficacy

    Albert Bandura, W H Freeman et al.•Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy•1999

  • Social learning theory

    Albert Bandura•Social learning theory•1977

  • Discussing dialogue

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies, Sarah Davies et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2009

  • Influence in science dialogue

    Open Access•Theodore E Zorn, Juliet Roper et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2012

  • The measurement of civic scientific literacy

    Open Access•Jon D Miller•Public Understanding of Science•1998

  • An Analysis of Visitation Patterns at the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Trondheim, Norway, from 1954 to 2006

    Kristian Overskaug, Gunnar Holt et al.•Visitor Studies•2010

  • Science Communication

    Open Access•Thomas Burns, T W Burns et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2003

  • Situated Learning

    Open Access•Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger•Situated Learning•1991

Citas por año0,5
Intervalo de citas2020 - 2024 (5)
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae