Re-Developing the Adversity Response Profile for Chinese University Students
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15469375 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Xiang Wang (0000-0002-2135-8576, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong, China), Wang Xiang (0000-0001-9815-1277, Education University of Hong Kong), Zi Yan (0000-0001-9305-884X, Education University of Hong Kong, autor de correspondencia), Yichao Huang (0000-0003-2320-2919, China Jiliang University), Anqi Tang (Huangshan University), Junjun Chen (0000-0002-1549-7991, Education University of Hong Kong) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 19 |
| Número | 11 |
| Páginas | 6389-6389 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-05-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Editorial | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph19116389 |
| PMID | 35681973 |
| OpenAlex | W4281481835 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 30 |
Adversity response is fundamental to dealing with adversity. This paper reports the re-development and subsequent psychometric evaluation of the Adversity Response Profile for Chinese University Students (ARP-CUS). The data were collected from a Chinese university student sample ( n = 474). Factor analysis and Rasch analysis were used to examine the psychometric properties of the ARP-CUS. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a six-factor model; then confirmatory factor analysis supported a five-factor solution. Rasch analysis provided further evidence of the psychometric quality of the instrument in terms of dimensionality, rating scale effectiveness, and item fit statistics for those six dimensions. The final version of the ARP-CUS contains 24 items across five subscales for assessing students' responses to adversity, including control, attribution, reach, endurance, and transcendence. Overall, ARP-CUS demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties for quantifying the adversity quotient of Chinese university students
Confirmatory factor analysis · Developmental psychology · Exploratory factor analysis · Psychometrics · Rasch model · Rating scale · Scale (ratio · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Clinical Psychology · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Sport Psychology and Performance
Exploring the Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Psychological Resilience Among Chinese Adolescents in Post-Pandemic Online Learning Contexts
Development of Adversity Quotient (AQ) index of pre-service teachers in Institute of Teacher Education (IPG)
Adversity Quotient Influences Self-Regulated Learning Strategies via Achievement Motivation Among Chinese University Students
The perceived teacher support scale (PTSS) for students
Further Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Multicomponent Mental Health Literacy Scale
Applying the Rasch Model
The achieving society.
Structural Equation Modeling
Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities.
A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring
The Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model
Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis
Cross-cultural normative assessment
Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology.
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity 1
Coping theory and research
Validating, Improving Reliability, and Estimating Correlation of the Four Subscales in the WHOQOL-BREF using Multidimensional Rasch Analysis
Validity of psychological assessment
Chinese Cultural Beliefs about Adversity
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,25 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |