How Should Global Health Security Priorities Be Set in the Global North and West
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15744889 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Abraar Karan (Brigham and Women's Hospital, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | E50-54 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Editorial | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2020.50 |
| PMID | 31958391 |
| OpenAlex | W2998222176 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 1 |
Epidemics threaten all countries, yet epidemic responses are not implemented in all countries. One reason why is that transnational disease containment efforts (to keep diseases from spreading across borders) differ in important ways from efforts to protect those in countries where an epidemic is active. This article explores these 2 approaches to global health security and suggests reasons to reconsider prioritizing the former first
Business · Economic growth · Economics · Global health · Health care · Health security · Public health · Set (abstract data type · Computer Science · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Global Security and Public Health · Medicine · Nursing · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,17 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |