Mapping family language policy on Chinese heritage language development in immigrant families
A scoping review
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19224554 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Changchun Li (0000-0002-4699-8609, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, autor de correspondencia), Claudia Vallejo (0000-0002-1920-4623, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona), Claudia Vallejo Rubinstein (Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona), Melinda Dooly (0000-0002-1478-4892, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Páginas | 1-21 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-05-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Current Issues in Language Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1466-4208 • E-ISSN: 1747-7506 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14664208.2026.2677896 |
| OpenAlex | W7162118612 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 68 |
This scoping review focuses on how existing studies have examined Chinese heritage language (CHL) through the lens of FLP. Guided by PRISMA-ScR guidelines and Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, it synthesises 53 peer-reviewed articles (2006–2025) retrieved from four databases. Findings reveal a rapid growth in publications since 2021, covering 22 countries but showing a persistent geographical bias toward English-speaking and Global North contexts. Methodologically, the field is dominated by small-scale qualitative designs, with limited use of quantitative or mixed-methods approaches. Conceptually, CHL is largely homogenised as Mandarin, with insufficient operationalisation of internal varieties. In parallel, FLP has expanded from language planning to encompass dynamic practices shaped by emotion, capital, power relations, and multimodal resources. Consequently, CHL outcomes extend beyond the linguistic dimension to include emotional-relational impacts, social positioning, and identity negotiation. Building on these insights, the review proposes an integrated framework comprising three mutually constitutive dimensions: the knowledge context, the conceptualisation of CHL, and a processual understanding of FLP. This framework offers a forward-looking lens for understanding FLP as a context-embedded process through which CHL is defined, practised, and negotiated in immigrant family life
First language · Heritage language · Immigration · Language planning · Language policy · Multilingualism · Native-language instruction · Policy development · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · French Language Learning Methods · Multilingual Education and Policy
Language Management
Reversing Language Shift
Language Policy
Biliteracy and trilingual practices in the home context
An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers
Family language policy
Factors influencing family language policy
Scoping reviews
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
Parents’ Perceptions and Management of Children’s Learning of Chinese as a Heritage Language
What bedtime story means for heritage language development changes and continuities in shared reading during children’s primary school transition
Exploring Chinese heritage language (CHL) retention in New Zealand Chinese immigrant families
Family language policy and the design of homescape in transnational families
Unpacking complex language ideologies toward heritage language maintenance
Speaking Chinese or no breakfast
‘妈妈, I miss you ’
Maintaining a minor language or a heritage language? A case study of maintaining Chinese with preteenagers in Australian interlingual families
Heritage language socialization in Chinese American immigrant families
The role of agency in the language choices of a trilingual two-year-old in conversation with monolingual grandparents
Chinese Immigrant Parents’ Attitudes, Expectations and Practices regarding Their Children’s Chinese Language Maintenance
Intergenerational Shifts of Heritage Language Ideologies through a Language Ecology Lens
Conceptualisation of family and language practice in family language policy research on migrants
Language policy and planning for heritage language maintenance
Invisible and visible language planning
Family language policy
Prolepsis, syncretism, and synergy in early language and literacy practices
Language Maintenance and Language Shift Among Chinese Immigrant Parents and Their Second-Generation Children in the U.S
An AsianCrit perspective on Chinese immigrant parents’ language ideologies
Heritage language maintenance of Chinese immigrant families
Challenging journeys for minority language-speaking parents
Family linguistic ecology in Chinese American diasporas
Language ideologies and practices in flux
It’s the Chinese that I don’t understand’
Inclusion of heritage language learners on the autism spectrum
Managing heritage language development
Monolingual disobedience, multilingual guilt
来来, 大家一起玩’ (C’mon, let’s play together)
Jij bent Chinese! Ik niet! (You are Chinese! I am not!)’
Language policy, multilingual encounters, and transnational families
Transnational experience, aspiration and family language policy
Family language policy among new order regime generations of Medan Chinese heritage language speakers
Exploring the Relationship between Family Language Policy and Heritage Language Knowledge Among Second Generation Russian–Jewish Immigrants in Israel
When they speak English, it's normal’
Family language policy – the critical domain
Language Ideologies in Glocal Contexts
Coping with National Language Policy Shift
Family language policy and parental language ideologies among Chinese transnational families in multilingual Luxembourg
Scoping studies
Journey towards an unreachable destiny
Family Language Policy
Family language policy by Hakkas in Balik Pulau, Penang
Reimagining Chinese diasporas in a transnational world
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |