Development of a Heart Transplant Readiness Scale for Waiting-List Adults
A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
Datos Bibliográficos
Background Heart transplantation (HT) outcomes are greatly affected by psychological, social, behavioral, and self-care aspects. But still, there is no suitable instrument available for measuring readiness of HT among adult waiting-list patients, especially in the case of Iran. Objective To develop and validate the Heart Transplantation Readiness Scale for Adult Patients on the Waiting List (HTRW-A). Methods This exploratory sequential mixed-methods research consists of two phases at five cardiac centers in Tehran, Iran. In Phase 1 (qualitative), semi-structured interviews will be conducted with the participants including HT candidates, HT recipients, family members, nursing staff, medical doctors, transplant coordinators, and managers (estimated n=20-30). The qualitative data will be analyzed using the conventional content analysis method to find out the concept and dimensions of HT readiness. In Phase 2 (quantitative), the qualitative findings will be used to generate the items. Psychometric properties will be assessed based on numerous stated evaluations; these will include: face validity, content validity (CVR, CVI), construct validity (exploratory factor analysis), convergent validity (using SIPAT) and also Cronbach’s alpha to measure internal consistency, and ICC to evaluate test-retest reliability using data collected from approximately 250 to 300 patients who are placed on a waiting list for HT. Expected Outcomes The HTRW-A is intended to serve as a valid, reliable, and culturally sensitive method of obtaining the multidimensionality of one’s readiness for HT. By identifying areas where a patient may be lacking in their preparedness for the transplant process, healthcare providers can better offer specific interventions prior to a transplant
Construct validity · Content validity · Exploratory factor analysis · Face validity · Health care · Preparedness · Protocol (science) · Psychological intervention · Qualitative research · Scale (ratio) · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments · Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2018 Update
Meaningful integration within mixed methods studies
Retracted
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations
Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment
Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Qualitative content analysis in nursing research
The content validity index
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity 1
Religiously Conditioned Health Behaviors within Selected Religious Traditions
Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Exploratory Factor Analysis
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |