Public attitudes towards Covid‐19 contact tracing apps

A UK‐based focus group study

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19509026
AutoresSimon Williams (0000-0003-2854-9946, Centre for People and Organisation School of Management Swansea University Swansea UK, autor de correspondencia), Christopher J Armitage (0000-0003-2365-1765, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology University of Manchester Manchester UK), Tova Tampe (0000-0002-3692-9220, World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland), Kimberly Dienes (0000-0002-6119-7025, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology University of Manchester Manchester UK)
Año2021
Volumen24
Número2
Páginas377-385
Fecha de publicación2021-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.13179
PMID33434404
OpenAlexW3120928504
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas29
Referencias citadas22

BACKGROUND: During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, one of the key components of many countries' strategies to reduce the spread of the virus is contact tracing. OBJECTIVE: To explore public attitudes to a COVID-19 contact tracing app in the United Kingdom. SETTING: Online video-conferencing. PARTICIPANTS: 27 participants, UK residents aged 18 years and older. METHODS: Qualitative study consisting of six focus groups carried out between 1st-12th May, 2020 (39-50 days into the UK 'lockdown'). RESULTS: Participants were divided as to whether or not they felt they would use the app. Analysis revealed five themes: (1) lack of information and misconceptions surrounding COVID-19 contact tracing apps; (2) concerns over privacy; (3) concerns over stigma; (4)concerns over uptake; and (5) contact tracing as the 'greater good'. Concerns over privacy, uptake and stigma were particularly significant amongst those stated they will not be using the app, and the view that the app is for the 'greater good' was particularly significant amongst those who stated they will be using the app. One of the most common misconceptions about the app was that it could allow users to specifically identify and map COVID-19 cases amongst their contacts and in their vicinity. CONCLUSIONS: Our participants were torn over whether digital contact tracing is a good idea or not, and views were heavily influenced by moral reasoning. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patients were involved in this study. The public were not involved in the development of the research questions, research design or outcome measures. A pilot focus group with participants not included in the present paper was used to help test and refine the focus group questions. Summary results were disseminated via email to participants prior to publication for feedback and comment

Contact tracing · Focus group · Internet privacy · Medical education · Psychiatry · Sociology · Computer Science · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Medicine · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Psychology