What Is Wrong with Kamm's and Scanlon's Arguments Against Taurek
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19524809 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tyler Doggett (0000-0001-5714-3633, University of Vermont, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2009 |
| Volumen | 3 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 1-16 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2009-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1559-3061 • E-ISSN: 1559-3061 |
| Editorial | Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.26556/jesp.v3i3.36 |
| OpenAlex | W213093053 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 20 |
In forced choices between lives, where one group is larger than the other, Taurek claims you can save the few. Kamm and Scanlon argue that this is unfair. I argue it is fair. By Kamm’s and Scanlon’s own lights, it is fair. Kamm and Scanlon also try to explain why you are, in these forced choices, required to save the many. These attempts can be interpreted in three ways. I argue none works. By Kamm’s and Scanlon’s own lights, the most promising one does not work
Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Owing, Justifying, and Rejecting
V—Fairness
Contractualism and Aggregation
What We Owe to Many
Saving People and Flipping Coins
What We Owe to Each Other
Aggregation and Two Moral Methods
Kamm on Fairness
Precis of Morality, Mortality, Vol. 1
Aggregating Costs and Benefits
The Numbers Problem
Saving Lives, Moral Theory, and the Claims of Individuals
Taurek's No Worse Claim
Can a Nonconsequentialist Count Lives
Intricate Ethics
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,45 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2015 - 2024 (10) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |