Democracy after Virtue
Toward Pragmatic Confucian Democracy
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19986195 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kim (0000-0003-2291-5896, autor de correspondencia), Sungmoon Kim |
| Año | 2018 |
| Páginas | 272 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2018-05-24 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Revista | Democracy after Virtue (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780190671235.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4247416290 |
| Open Library | OL27847069M |
| ISBN | 9780190671235 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 38 |
In the past two decades contemporary Confucian political theory has been propelled by the dialectical conversation between Confucianism and democracy and, more recently, between Confucian democracy and Confucian meritocracy. However, the absence of a shared point of reference in developing Confucian democratic theory has made it extremely difficult to understand whether the disagreement between Confucian democrats and Confucian meritocrats is merely a political one or is also of philosophical significance. Democracy after Virtue explores a normative Confucian democratic theory that justifies democracy on pragmatic grounds, both as a political system and as a way of life in East Asia, with special attention to Confucianism, a dominant cultural tradition in the region, as well as to the value pluralism and moral conflict that increasingly characterize the circumstances of East Asian politics. It presents “pragmatic Confucian democracy” as a fresh normative framework that can help (1) identify the social circumstances that require a democracy as a political system in a Confucian society, (2) explain the internal connection between two dimensions of democracy that are commonly presented in political science as being at odds with each other, (3) make sense of the value of democracy coherently with reference to its two dimensions, (4) illuminate the theoretical connection between democratic procedures and the outcomes they produce, and (5) articulate distinctively Confucian democratic principles of justice in criminal punishment, economic distribution, and international relations (humanitarian intervention in particular) from a pragmatic standpoint
Democracy · Dialectic · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Virtue · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Confucianism · East asia · Political aspects · politics and government · Religious aspects
Confucian Democrats, Not Confucian Democracy
In Defense of Public Reason Confucianism
State perfectionism and the importance of Confucianism for East Asia's future development
What Confucianism and for Whom? The Value and Dilemma of Invoking Confucianism in Confucian Political Theories
Jizha’s Dilemma
Democracy and Nationalism in Korea
Confucian Sentimental Representation
[Scholar’s Corner
A Confucian-Inspired Perspective on East Asia’s Future
Confucian Democracy or Meritocracy? Mapping a Two‐Decade Debate
Democratic meritocracy based on virtue preselection and consent validation – political meritocracy meets electoral democracy
Comparative Democratic Theory
Li Zehou’s Ideas on Chinese Modernity Revisited
The meritocratic paradox
An epistemic case for confucian democracy
Truth, diversity, and Confucian epistemic democracy
Confucian Familialism and the Crisis of Care
Theorizing Confucian Virtue Politics
Exploring economic equality through a dialogue between Confucianism and limitarianism
Toward Confucian Economic Democracy
Reasonable Pluralism and Pragmatic Confucian Democracy
Trends in Political Science Research
Can meritocracy replace democracy? A conceptual framework
Political meritocracy versus ethical democracy
The challenge of Confucian political meritocracy
Towards Confucian democratic meritocracy
Political meritocracy and its betrayal
More than good executives
Designing Confucian democracy
Confucianism and Democratic Constitutionalism in East Asia
Progressive Confucianism
Self-Restriction, Political Myth, and the Politics of the Ordinary
Well-Being, Harmony, and Deference
Why Confucian Meritocrats Must Be Democrats
Deliberative mini-publics as a Confucian institution
Meritocracy in the Political and Economic Spheres
Breaking the Mold
The Political Economy of Confucian Harmony
| Obras citantes distintas | 38 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 5,43 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 38 |