The China Model
Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 20005278 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Daniel A Bell (0000-0002-5521-3383) |
| Año | 2016 |
| Páginas | 336 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2016-09-06 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Revista | China Model (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editorial | Princeton University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.23943/princeton/9780691173047.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2789964367 |
| Open Library | OL29313686M |
| ISBN | 9780691173047 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 74 |
Westerners tend to divide the political world into “good” democracies and “bad” authoritarian regimes, but the Chinese political model does not fit neatly in either category. Over the past three decades, China has evolved a political system that can best be described as “political meritocracy.” This book seeks to understand the ideals and the reality of this unique political system. How do the ideals of political meritocracy set the standard for evaluating political progress (and regress) in China? How can China avoid the disadvantages of political meritocracy? And how can political meritocracy best be combined with democracy? This book answers these questions and more. Opening with a critique of “one person, one vote” as a way of choosing top leaders, it argues that Chinese-style political meritocracy can help to remedy the key flaws of electoral democracy. It discusses the advantages and pitfalls of political meritocracy, distinguishes between different ways of combining meritocracy and democracy, and argues that China has evolved a model of democratic meritocracy that is morally desirable and politically stable. It also summarizes and evaluates the “China model”—meritocracy at the top, experimentation in the middle, and democracy at the bottom—and its implications for the rest of the world. The book looks at a political system that not only has had a long history in China, but could prove to be the most important political development of the twenty-first century
Authoritarianism · China · Democracy · Economic system · Economics · Meritocracy · Political economy · Political science · Political system · Politics · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · Law · 1976 · Elections · Elite (Social sciences) · Ethics · Merit (Ethics) · Political activity · Political Culture · Political Ideologies · Political leadership · Political Process · politics and government
The Evolution of Representative Claim-Making by the Chinese Communist Party
Research of the Risk Factors of China's Unsustainable Socioeconomic Development
Meritocracy or Patronage?
The Long East Asia
The influence of Confucianism on Chinese politics and foreign policy
Political realism meets civic republicanism
Authoritarian Powers and Norm Contestation in the Liberal International Order
China’s mediated public diplomacy towards Japan
Le care pour les personnes âgées en contexte « chinois »
Coping with growth in China
Confucian democracy as popular sovereignty
Confucian Characteristics of Korean Democracy
Jizha’s Dilemma
The ambitious new public diplomacy and dilemma
A genealogy of politics
Toward just energy transitions in authoritarian regimes
Doctoral students from Chinese prestigious universities who wish to work in the government sector
When and Why People Prefer Higher Educated Politicians
Geography of government support in China
"China" as an Analytical Concept
Hegel and China
Mini-publics and Political Meritocracy
The Scope of Justice Dilemma
Agenda of Historical Political Science in China
Unpacking constitutional literacy
Selection of China's Top Leadership Cadre
Why There Has Been No Anti-Regime Movement on College Campus in China for Three Decades? A Survey Study at Thirty-Five Universities (2015–2018) and Its Implications
The Rise of the Princelings in China
China beyond China, establishing a digital order with Chinese characteristics
The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation
The soft power of hard tech—The “Shenzhen Model” as an ideological device
Institutionalization of public interest in planning
Greening the Chinese Leviathan
Epistemic democracy and meritocratic leadership
Reexamining confucianism and democratic support
Cadre Nation
Enhancing Research on Authoritarian Regimes through Detailed Comparisons of China and Vietnam
Good Weeds? Alfarabi’s Virtuous Subversives
Culture of Meritocracy, Political Hegemony, and Singapore’s Development
Diverging Standpoints in the Spiral of Change
The discursive logics of online populism
Against “Democratizing AI”
La cooptación de la democracia en Ecuador a través del Consejo de Participación Ciudadana durante el gobierno de Rafael Correa (2009-2017)
Hybrid Constitutionalism
China's Gilded Age
The discourse of Xinmin
International norms clash with China’s consumer nationalism
A Critical Discussion of Daniel A. Bell’s Political Meritocracy
Stuck in Place? A Field Experiment on the Effects of Reputational Information on Student Evaluations
The Marketplace of Ideas and the Agora
Morality and ability
More than good executives
Governance and public administration in China
Populism and Nationalism
Confucianism and Democratic Constitutionalism in East Asia
Toned Habitus’, Self-Emancipation and the Contingency of Reflexivity
Does Gender Equality Matter for Democracy? Confucian Norms and Public Attitudes Toward Democracy in East Asia
The case for epistocratic republicanism
Two Theories of Self-Determination
Self-Restriction, Political Myth, and the Politics of the Ordinary
No Virtue Like Resilience
Ministries matter
Political elites in deliberative democracy
Political participation as self-cultivation
The historical resources of China’s model
Political Incentives and Local Policy Innovations in China
Political meritocracy and policy integration
The Recruitment Process for Grassroots Cadres in a Chinese County
Extended state infrastructure power in an age of networked competition
Ecumenical critical theory, pluralism and developmental trends
Meritocracy in the Political and Economic Spheres
Appropriating Democracy
Rethinking the Relationship Between Freedom and Benevolence in Liberal Confucianism
Daoist Reflections on the See-Saw of Contingency and Autonomy
| Obras citantes distintas | 74 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 6,73 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 72 |