On coordination in child language

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20366755
AutoresGail Ardery (University of Iowa, autor de correspondencia)
Año1980
Volumen7
Número2
Páginas305-320
Fecha de publicación1980-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Child Language (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0305-0009 • E-ISSN: 1469-7602
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0305000900002646
PMID7410496
OpenAlexW2139934562
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas5

This paper evaluates Lust's (1977) study of coordination in child language, both on its own merits and in the light of my own research. First, particular design weaknesses in Lust's study are noted which render her results questionable. In addition, it is argued that the hypotheses proposed by Lust fail to make any substantive predictions about the types of errors which children make with coordinate structures. Finally, it is shown that Lust's hypotheses cannot account for the results of my own comprehension and non-imitative production experiments. It is concluded that Lust cannot account for a wide range of phenomena concerning coordination in child language, and consequently an alternative set of hypotheses is proposed

Cognitive psychology · Comprehension · Linguistics · Lust · Psychoanalysis · Computer Science · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology · Speech and dialogue systems