Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Textbook Reading Strategies and Its Relationship to Reading Test Performance

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21185331
AutoresLijuan Li (0000-0001-5665-5872, Universiti Sains Malaysia), Sarjit Kaur (0000-0002-9307-5313, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia)
Año2014
Volumen14
Número03
Páginas1-18
Fecha de publicación2014-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaGEMA Online Journal of Language Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1675-8021 • E-ISSN: 2550-2131
EditorialPenerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17576/gema-2014-1403-01
OpenAlexW2018526161
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas5

Research studies on reading strategy use among ESL/EFL readers are increasingly becoming one of the most attended topics for researchers and educators. This study investigated the reading strategies used by 290 Chinese EFL second year undergraduates and examined the relationship between their reading strategy use and reading test performance. The participants reported their use of reading strategies through the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) in three categories: global reading strategies (GLOB), problem solving strategies (PROB) and support reading strategies (SUP). Students’ reading test performance was measured by using the national College English Test Band-4 (CET-4). Results showed that students used overall reading strategies at a medium frequency level. They used PROB strategies most frequently (at a high level), followed by GLOB strategies (at a medium level). The least frequently used were SUP strategies (at a medium level). The most frequently used individual strategies were re-reading, regaining concentration and guessing the content of the text. The least frequently used strategies included reading aloud, questioning, paraphrasing, and translating. There was no significant relationship between students’ overall reading strategy use and their general reading test performance. However, significant relationship was found between some individual reading strategies and different test formats. Students’ banked cloze test performance was positively correlated to GLOB strategies. SUP strategies were negatively correlated to students’ skimming and scanning performance. Most PROB strategies were related to student performance in fast reading either positively or negatively. Pedagogical implications are discussed in relation to the Chinese EFL context. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1403-01

Linguistics · Mathematics education · Reading aloud · Computer Science · Educational Methods and Media Use · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning

  • Motivation, Strategy Use, and Comprehension in Foreign Language Reading

    Open Access•Hassan M Kassem, Demah Aamer Alqahtani•Journal of Language Teaching and…•2023

  • Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies.

    Kouider Mokhtari, Carla A Reichard•Journal of Educational Psychology•2002

  • Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Reading Strategies

    Open Access•Peter Afflerbach, P David Pearson et al.•The Reading Teacher•2008

  • A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance

    Open Access•Aek Phakiti•Language Testing•2003

  • Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers

    Open Access•Ravi Sheorey, Kouider Mokhtari•System•2001

  • How Classroom Teachers Can Help Students Learn and Teach Them How to Learn

    Kenneth A Kiewra•Theory Into Practice•2002

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,33
Intervalo de citas2023 - 2023 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae