Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Food safety and cognitive biases

What we know, what we need to know, and why

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21295253
AutoresHarvey S James (0000-0003-0189-271X, University of Missouri), Michelle S Segovia (0000-0001-5298-5612, University of Missouri), Michelle Segovia, Damilola Giwa-Daramola (0009-0000-5258-8078, University of Missouri)
Año2023
Volumen125
Número10
Páginas3717-3733
Fecha de publicación2023-10-10
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaBritish Food Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108
EditorialEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/bfj-09-2022-0824
OpenAlexW4382864199
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas73

Purpose The authors review the small but growing literature linking cognitive biases to food safety problems and foodborne illness outbreaks. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a search of peer-reviewed articles utilizing empirical methods published since the year 2000 focusing on food safety or foodborne illnesses/outbreaks and cognitive biases. Findings The authors find that most research is conducted at the consumer side of the food system, with few studies examining the potential problems that can arise in the production and processing of food. The authors also observe that most research tends to focus on a few cognitive biases. Originality/value This is the most comprehensive study to date examining insights from the literature on cognitive biases and the related discipline of behavioral economics to the specific problem of foodborne illness outbreaks and food safety problems

Business · Cognition · Cognitive bias · Computer security · Food safety · Need to know · Originality · Psychiatry · Computer Science · Food Safety and Hygiene · Marketing · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Surface hygiene in school foodservice

    Yonghee Suk, Sunny Ham•British Food Journal•2026

  • AI-driven food safety risk prediction

    Ömer Faruk Sari, Mohamed Bader-El-Den et al.•British Food Journal•2025

  • "Coherent Arbitrariness"

    Dan Ariely, G Loewenstein et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2003

  • Optimal Expectations

    Markus K Brunnermeier, Jonathan A Parker•American Economic Review•2005

  • Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases

    Open Access•Jörg Oechssler, Andreas Roider et al.•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2009

  • On narrow norms and vague heuristics

    Gerd Gigerenzer•Psychological Review•1996

  • From Intentions to Actions

    Icek Ajzen•Action Control•1985

  • Confirmation Bias

    Open Access•Raymond S Nickerson•Review of General Psychology•1998

  • Potential consequences of Covid-19 for sustainable meat consumption

    Open Access•Xisi Yang•British Food Journal•2020

  • Understanding barriers to consumers to stop washing raw poultry through in-depth interviews

    Open Access•Abigail Gilman, Shauna C Henley et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • Illusory Control

    Open Access•Nathanael J Fast, Deborah H Gruenfeld et al.•Psychological Science•2009

  • Cognitive Biases of Consumers’ Risk Perception of Foodborne Diseases in China

    Open Access•Lijie Shan, Shusai Wang et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation

    Icek Ajzen, Martin Fishbein•European Review of Social…•2000

  • Behavioral Ethics and the Incidence of Foodborne Illness Outbreaks

    Open Access•Harvey S James, Michelle S Segovia•Journal of Agricultural and…•2020

  • Locus of control at work

    Open Access•Thomas W H Ng, Kelly L Sorensen et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2006

  • The illusion of control

    Open Access•Diana Stuart•Agriculture and Human Values•2008

  • Risk, anti-reflexivity, and ethical neutralization in industrial food processing

    Open Access•Diana Stuart, Michelle R Worosz•Agriculture and Human Values•2011

  • The impact of expiration dates labels on hedonic markets for perishable products

    Open Access•Tongzhe Li, Kent D Messer et al.•Food Policy•2020

  • Risk perceptions and food-handling practices in the home

    Open Access•Keith S Evans, Mario F Teisl et al.•Food Policy•2020

  • Cognitive biases in the assimilation of scientific information on global warming and genetically modified food

    Open Access•Brandon R Mcfadden, Jayson L Lusk•Food Policy•2015

  • The quality of food risk management in Europe

    Open Access•Julie Houghton, J R Houghton et al.•Food Policy•2007

  • Consumer perceptions of food safety risk, control and responsibility

    Open Access•Elizabeth C Redmond, Christopher J Griffith et al.•Appetite•2004

  • The portion size effect on food intake. An anchoring and adjustment process

    Open Access•David Marchiori, Esther K Papies et al.•Appetite•2014

  • Behavioral Public Administration ad fontes

    Open Access•R Paul Battaglio, Paolo Belardinelli et al.•Public Administration Review•2018

  • Cultural evolutionary behavioural science in public policy

    Open Access•Robin Schimmelpfennig, Michael Muthukrishna•Behavioural Public Policy•2023

  • Habits as knowledge structures

    Henk Aarts, Ap Dijksterhui et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

  • Unrealistic optimism about future life events

    Neil D Weinstein•Journal of Personality and Social…•1980

  • Anomalies

    Open Access•Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch et al.•The Journal of Economic…•1991

  • A manifesto for applying behavioural science

    Open Access•Michael Hallsworth•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • Heuristics and Biases in Retirement Savings Behavior

    Open Access•Shlomo Benartzi, Richard H Thaler•The Journal of Economic…•2007

Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOI
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae