Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Using Intent‐to‐Attend to Predict Attendance in Community‐Based Relationship Education

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21320055
AutoresRyan G Carlson (0000-0001-6637-066X, Department of Educational Studies University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA, autor de correspondencia), Nathan Wheeler (0000-0002-0489-5695, Department of Counseling and Special Education Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USA), Sejal M Barden (0000-0001-8140-8419, Marriage and Family Research Institute University of Central Florida Orlando FL USA), Shannon M Romagnolo (School Counseling in the College of Education and Human Services University of North Florida Jacksonville FL USA), Dalena Dillman Talyor (Marriage and Family Research Institute University of Central Florida Orlando FL USA), Christopher J Hipp (0000-0002-1983-4182, Department of Educational Studies University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA), Nicole Silverio (0000-0003-2639-4637, Marriage and Family Research Institute University of Central Florida Orlando FL USA), Madeline Moran (0000-0002-5028-035X, Private Practice Austin TX USA)
Año2022
Volumen61
Número1
Páginas130-145
Fecha de publicación2022-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFamily Process (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0014-7370 • E-ISSN: 1545-5300
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/famp.12662
PMID33904591
OpenAlexW3157993208
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas51

Government‐supported relationship education has provided resources for inclusion of economically vulnerable and ethnically diverse participants; however, many grantees and programs struggled to retain couples in longitudinal studies, which has likely influenced study effects and threatened internal validity. In the present study, we assessed 1,056 couples’ baseline relationship satisfaction and intent‐to‐attend their next scheduled visit while participating in a randomized controlled trial of relationship education and evaluated the predictive ability of their responses to remain in the six‐month study. We conducted actor‐partner interdependence models for couples, using a probit cross‐lagged regression with a structural equation modeling framework, to test the dyadic influence of intent‐to‐attend on future couple attendance. We also examined the influence of higher or lower baseline relationship satisfaction between partners and group assignment (treatment or wait‐list control) on attendance. Intent‐to‐attend scores were associated with attendance for couples at the one‐month follow‐up, and early attendance was the biggest predictor of later attendance. Additionally, baseline intent‐to‐attend scores predicted later intent‐to‐attend scores for all follow‐up time points. However, we found no partner effects, and no effects for the influence of baseline relationship satisfaction or group assignment. We discuss practical suggestions for including intent‐to‐attend in future studies, relationship education programming, and general therapy practice

Attendance · Baseline (sea) · Government (linguistics) · Longitudinal study · Political science · Relationship education · Test (biology) · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Clinical Psychology · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • A Meta-Analysis of the Association Between the Hold Me Tight Program and Couples’ Relationship Adjustment

    William Bradley McKibben, A Stephen Lenz et al.•Counseling Outcome Research and…•2024

  • Emancipatory approaches in couples' intervention research

    Open Access•Andrew P Daire, Ryan G Carlson et al.•Family Process•2023

  • A randomized trial of relationship education using Within Our Reach for economically vulnerable couples

    Open Access•Sejal M Barden, Ryan G Carlson et al.•Family Process•2022

  • Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures Studies

    Roderick J A Little, Roderick J Little•Journal of the American…•1995

  • Emotional Conservatism

    Icek Ajzen•Contemporary Psychology•1980

  • Best Practices in Relationship Education Focused on Intimate Relationships

    Open Access•Scott M Stanley, Ryan G Carlson et al.•Family Relations•2020

  • A Revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for Use With Distressed and Nondistressed Couples

    Open Access•Dean Busby, Dean M Busby et al.•Journal of Marital and Family…•1995

  • Evidence-Based Survey Design

    Open Access•Seung Youn Yonnie Chyung, Seung Youn Chyung et al.•Performance Improvement•2017

  • Contextual Influences on Marriage

    Open Access•B R Karney, Thomas N Bradbury•Current Directions in Psychological…•2005

  • Relationship Education Research

    Open Access•Howard J Markman, Galena K Rhoades•Journal of Marital and Family…•2012

  • A Comparison of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Theory of Reasoned Action

    Open Access•Thomas J Madden, Pamela Scholder Ellen et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•1992

  • Effective Recruitment and Retention of Minority Research Participants

    Antronette K Yancey, Alexander N Ortega et al.•Annual Review of Public Health•2006

  • From Intentions to Actions

    Icek Ajzen•Action Control•1985

  • Missing data

    Joseph L Schafer, John W Graham et al.•Psychological Methods•2002

  • Group‐Based Trajectory Modeling of Marital Quality

    Open Access•Christine M Proulx, Ashley E Ermer et al.•Journal of Family Theory & Review•2017

  • A Critical Review of Help-Seeking for Couples Therapy

    Open Access•Aimee Hubbard, Steven Harris et al.•Contemporary Family Therapy•2020

  • An Investigation of Couples’ Help-Seeking

    Open Access•Kenneth J Parnell, Michael Scheel et al.•Contemporary Family Therapy•2017

  • Early Termination from Couple Therapy in a Naturalistic Setting

    Open Access•Josianne Mondor, Stéphane Sabourin et al.•Contemporary Family Therapy•2012

  • The Effects of Building Strong Families

    Open Access•Robert G Wood, Sheena Mcconnell et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2012

  • Divorce, Repartnering, and Stepfamilies

    Open Access•R Kelly Raley, Megan M Sweeney•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2020

  • Examining Passive and Active Recruitment Methods for Low-Income Couples in Relationship Education

    Ryan G Carlson, Jessica A Fripp et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2014

  • Linking Economic Hardship to Marital Quality and Instability

    Rand D Conger, Glen H Elder et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1990

  • Couple Resilience to Economic Pressure Over Time and Across Generations

    Open Access•April S Masarik, Monica J Martins et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2016

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,75
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2024 (3)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae