Understanding student use of epistemic criteria in engineering design contexts
Datos Bibliográficos
Recent trends have shifted the focus of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education onto practice‐based learning, to encourage opportunities for students to engage in science and engineering practices (SEPs) with the goal of more meaningful participation and engagement in authentic STEM experiences for all students. However, we do not fully understand how K–12 engineering students use the SEP of argumentation to design solutions or make problem‐solving decisions. In this study, we examine middle school students’ discourse to understand the epistemic criteria students use when making design decisions and how they meaningfully take up epistemic practices for engineering, specifically when engaging in engineering design. We find that students use five epistemic criteria ( nature , creativity and innovation , justification , collaboration , and the user ) in ways meaningful to design‐oriented goals, even at the beginning of the school year, and that consideration of these criteria varies according to the implicit goals in each stage of the design process. These findings suggest that (i) students took up epistemic goals for sensemaking and designing solutions, and (ii) students already possessed the skills and abilities to meaningfully engage in design work, suggesting an asset view of student epistemic practices should be adopted
Argumentation theory · Asset (computer security) · Creativity · Design Science · Engineering design process · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Mathematics education · Next Generation Science Standards · Pedagogy · Philosophy of science · Process (computing) · Science education · Sensemaking · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Engineering · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Social Psychology
“Okay We’re Doing My Idea”
An examination of student epistemic agency
Modeling relationships among beliefs about scientific knowledge, beliefs about justification for knowing in science, and argumentative reasoning about a climate-related issue
Examining the Affordances of Engineering and Curricular Supports for Learning Among Emerging Bilingual Elementary Afterschool Students
A Call to Explicitly Name and Account for Power in Epistemic Agency Research
What Engineers Know and How They Know It
Epistemic Practices and Science Education
Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation
Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning
Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments
Epistemologies in practice
Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation
Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room
Epistemic Practices of Engineering for Education
Exploring the Promises and Perils of Integrated STEM Through Disciplinary Practices and Epistemologies
Examining how classroom communities developed practice-based epistemologies for science through analysis of longitudinal video data
Practical Epistemic Cognition in a Design Project—Engineering Students Developing Epistemic Fluency
Content Learning and Identity Construction
Cultural processes in science education
Science Education in Three-Part Harmony
Epistemological Dominance and Social Inequality
Argumentation and Decision Making in Professional Practice
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |