Modeling relationships among beliefs about scientific knowledge, beliefs about justification for knowing in science, and argumentative reasoning about a climate-related issue
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21490225 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Fang‐Ying Yang (0000-0002-0352-2686, National Taiwan Normal University), Kaushal Kumar Bhagat (0000-0002-6861-6819, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur), Christian Brandmo (0000-0003-3641-6414, University of Oslo), Wan-Yue Zhan (0000-0002-7160-3058, National Taiwan Normal University), Ivar Bråten (0000-0002-9242-9087, University of Oslo, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 40 |
| Número | 1 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | European Journal of Psychology of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0256-2928 • E-ISSN: 1878-5174 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10212-024-00922-6 |
| OpenAlex | W4405272803 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 71 |
In a sample of 323 engineering students, structural equation modeling was used to test hypothesized relationships between beliefs about the nature of knowledge in science, beliefs about the process of justification for knowing in science, and argumentative reasoning about an ill-structured social-scientific issue. Beliefs about justification for knowing were directly related to argumentative reasoning, with beliefs in justification by school-based authority being a negative predictor and beliefs in justification by research-based authority being a positive predictor of students’ evidence- and knowledge-based reasoning, and with beliefs in personal justification being a negative predictor of students’ consideration of counterarguments. These beliefs about justification for knowing in science were, in turn, predicted by students’ beliefs about the certainty and development of scientific knowledge. The discussion highlights the multileveled and multidimensional view of epistemic beliefs that follows from our investigation, as well as the role of such beliefs in students’ argumentative reasoning
Argumentative · Certainty · Educational psychology · Epistemology · Mathematics education · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Structural equation modeling · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Social Psychology
The Skills of Argument
Assessing Model Fit
An OECD Learning Framework 2030
The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in Self-Regulated Learning
Reflective Judgment
TAPping into argumentation
The Development of Epistemological Theories
Epistemic Cognition and Evaluating Information
On the Goals of Epistemic Education
Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts
Multiple-documents literacy
Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition
Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
In Search of Golden Rules
Grade 8 Lebanese students’ reasoning and decision-making about scientific versus socio-scientific issues
Analyzing visual attention during TAP learning and the effect of epistemic beliefs on the understanding of argument components
Understanding student use of epistemic criteria in engineering design contexts
Epistemic orientation toward teaching science for knowledge generation
Investigating structural relationships among upper‐secondary school students' beliefs about knowledge, justification for knowing, and Internet‐specific justification in the domain of science
Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic Cognition
The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education
Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education
College students' scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making
Science Education in Three-Part Harmony
Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |