Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

For whom is it worth lying? Prosocial lies in school children

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21432695
AutoresDaiane Araujo de Arruda (0000-0002-2509-3368, Universidade Federal de São Carlos), Débora De Hollanda Souza (0000-0002-0485-7787, Universidade Federal de São Carlos)
Año2020
Volumen30
Fecha de publicación2020-01-01
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPaidéia (Ribeirão Preto (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0103-863X • E-ISSN: 1982-4327
EditorialFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/1982-4327e3019
OpenAlexW3042312649
SciELOS0103-863X2020000100308
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas24

A prosocial lie is a false statement intended to help and not to harm someone. The present study investigated possible effects of age and culture in 97 Brazilian children’s responses (7 to 11 years of age) in a prosocial lying task, designed for a previous study with Canadian and Chinese children. The task consisted in presenting four dilemmas followed by questions about what children should do: tell the truth or lie to protect the self, a friend or a group? No effect of age was found for the lying scores, but the lying-for-friend scores were significantly higher than the lying-for-self and lying-for-collective scores. This pattern of results suggests that, in contrast to Chinese and Canadian children, Brazilian children find it more worthwhile to tell a lie that protects a friend than a lie that protects self-interests or those of a group

Developmental psychology · Harm · Lying · Political science · Prosocial behavior · Statement (logic) · Task (project management) · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Children Talk About The Mind

    Karen Bartsch, Henry M Wellman•Children talk about the mind•1995

  • Making Minds

    Henry M Wellman•Making Minds•2014

  • Where (Who) Are Collectives in Collectivism? Toward Conceptual Clarification of Individualism and Collectivism.

    Marilynn B Brewer, Ya-Ru Chen•Psychological Review•2007

  • Social evaluation by preverbal infants

    Open Access•J Kiley Hamlin, Karen Wynn et al.•Nature•2007

  • Examining the Diversity of Prosocial Behavior

    Open Access•Kristen A Dunfield, Kristen Dunfield et al.•Infancy•2011

  • Do As I Say and Not As I Think

    Open Access•Jennifer Lavoie, Karissa Leduc et al.•Children & Society•2016

  • Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood

    Kana Imuta, Julie D Henry et al.•Developmental Psychology•2016

  • Consistency and Change in Children’s Tattling on their Siblings

    Open Access•Hildy S Ross, Irene M Den Bak‐Lammers•Social Development•1998

  • The sources of normativity

    Hannes Rakoczy, Felix Warneken et al.•Developmental Psychology•2008

  • Japanese and American children’s moral evaluations of reporting on transgressions

    Ivy Chiu Loke, Gail D Heyman et al.•Developmental Psychology•2014

  • Cross-cultural differences in children's choices, categorizations, and evaluations of truths and lies

    Genyue Fu, Fen Xu et al.•Developmental Psychology•2007

  • Unraveling the Mystery of Brazilian Jeitinho

    Open Access•Maria Cristina Ferreira, Ronald Fischer et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2011

  • Cross-Cultural Differences in Helping Strangers

    Open Access•Robert V Levine, Ara Norenzayan et al.•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2001

Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae