Winners and Losers in Russian Agrarian Reform
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2158152 |
|---|---|
| Autores | K Wegren (0000-0003-2846-2306, Southern Methodist University), Stephen K Wegren, David J O''Brien, David J O’brien (0000-0001-5302-4258, University of Missouri), David J O'Brien, Valeri V Patsiorkovski (Institute of Social and Economic Studies of Population) |
| Año | 2002 |
| Volumen | 30 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 1-29 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2002-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Journal of Peasant Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0306-6150 • E-ISSN: 1743-9361 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03066150412331333222 |
| OpenAlex | W1983743391 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 18 |
| Referencias citadas | 12 |
More than ten years after Russian agrarian reform was begun, it is appropriate to reflect upon winners and losers. Using survey data from 800 households in five Russian regions, this article is interested in the effect of reform within the rural sphere. The analysis focuses on four groups of rural actors within the food production sphere: private farmers, farm managers, specialists employed on state and collective farms and their juridical successors, and farm workers employed on state and collective farms and their juridical successors The first part of the article examines winners and losers using the following variables: self-perceptions about winners and losers, monthly household income, job security, and ownership of certain durable goods. We conclude that private farmers have fared best relative to other occupational groups. On large farms, managers have fared best. The second part of the article analyses why winners win by considering structural and behavioural factors. We conclude that winners win because they take advantage of reform opportunities and engage in market-based activities
Agrarian reform · Agrarian society · Agriculture · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Market economy · Production (economics · State (computer science · Land Rights and Reforms · Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition · Russia and Soviet political economy
Social mobility in rural Russia, 1995-2003
Russian Agriculture During Putin's First Term and Beyond
The Economics of Rural Households in Russia
Perm Oblast's approach to reducing rural poverty
Pathways of Rural Stratification in Russia's European North
Differentiating farmers
Household Responses, Regional Diversity and Contemporary Agrarian Reform in Russia
Introduction to symposium
Rural Reform and the Gender Gap in Post-Soviet Russia
Private Farming in Russia
Why Russia's Rural Poor Are Poor
Patterns of accumulation and social differentiation through a slow-paced agrarian market transition in post-Soviet Uzbekistan
The Development of Agrarian Capitalism in Post-Soviet Russia
Beyond Stratification
Rural Adaptation in Russia
Typologies of Household Risk-Taking
Post-Soviet Agricultural Employment
East meets West
New Rich, New Poor, New Russia
Public Opinion in Postcommunist Russia
Russian Agrarian Reform
Russia's Private Farm Movement
Socioeconomic Transformation in Russia
Democratization and Urban Bias in Postcommunist Russia
Russian agrarian reform and rural capitalism reconsidered
The development of Agrarian capitalism in Russia 1991-97
The politics of private farming in Russia
| Obras citantes distintas | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,78 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2003 - 2020 (18) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 18 |