In-service science teachers’ purposes for integrating the history of science
The role of their science teaching orientation
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21589946 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Çiçek Dilek Bakanay (0000-0001-9491-2569, Faculty of Education, Department of Elementary Education, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey, autor de correspondencia), Mustafa Çakır (0000-0002-9916-5117, Atatürk Faculty of Education, Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 44 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 939-961 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-04-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Science Education, Part B (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2154-8455 • E-ISSN: 2154-8463 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09500693.2022.2059120 |
| OpenAlex | W4223493552 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 55 |
This qualitative study examined teachers’ science teaching orientations (STO) and their purposes for integrating the history of science (HOS) into their teaching using newly developed instructional materials. The HOS may be used as an effective instructional tool for achieving scientific literacy; however, science teachers utilise it in various ways for very different purposes. Data was collected from nine in-service high school science teachers using an orientation interview protocol, reflective journals and semi-structured interviews. Data collection focused on the experiences of participating teachers who implemented instructional materials based on HOS over the course of two years. Participants’ STO profiles were classified into three groups: traditional, transitional and reformist. Data analysis revealed 13 distinct purposes for integrating HOS, which fell under four overarching domains: namely, pedagogical, conceptual, affective and epistemological. The results of the study revealed that teachers failed to relate HOS with the tenets of nature of science (NOS) in their teaching. They were not able to identify the potential NOS aspects within the HOS materials. Only the reformist teachers integrated HOS for epistemological purposes, whereas the traditional teachers relied on HOS simply as an interesting life and work stories of well-known scientists. Teachers could use HOS instructional materials for a variety of reasons by utilising different aspects of HOS as their views on science and teaching shift from traditional to reformist
Mathematics education · Nature of Science · Pedagogy · Science education · Scientific Literacy · Teaching method · Animal and Plant Science Education · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy
Attitudes towards science
Learners’ Responses to the Demands of Conceptual Change
Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design
Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research
Examining Teaching Emphases of History of Science in Award-Winning Science Lesson Plans in Macao
Promoting Aesthetic Experiences in Science Lessons
The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching
Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry
Knowledge and Teaching
Effective Reflective Practice
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |