Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Consensus and learning climate in temporary versus permanent teams in team-based learning

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21650335
AutoresMichaela Wagner‐Menghin (0000-0003-1645-7577, Medical University of Vienna, autor de correspondencia), Stefan Heber (0000-0002-3398-0442, Medical University of Vienna), Ivo Volf (0000-0002-0703-5244, Medical University of Vienna), Richard März (0009-0007-1023-2242, Medical University of Vienna), Michael J M Fischer (0000-0002-3811-7066, Medical University of Vienna)
Año2026
Volumen31
Número1
Páginas2694189-2694189
Fecha de publicación2026-12-31
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Education Online (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1087-2981 • E-ISSN: 1087-2981
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10872981.2026.2694189
PMID42374842
OpenAlexW7166705479
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas27

BACKGROUND: In team-based learning, students are typically placed in fixed teams based on the idea that stable group membership fosters collaboration: as teammates get to know each other, they share more information, resolve differences and feel motivated to contribute. This rationale had not been tested in a randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: The study compares team-based learning in temporary teams with the default permanent teams regarding individual and team readiness assurance test performance (iRAT, tRAT), reaching team consensus, the learning climate, and intrinsic motivation. DESIGN: In a randomized controlled trial, first-year medical students were assigned either to permanent TBL teams or to teams that were re-assigned for each problem. The team readiness assurance test (tRAT) votes, submitted individually and covertly, served as an indirect indicator for team consensus (concordant versus discordant tRAT vote). RESULTS: = 268, 11.8% of all votes) were submitted more frequently in temporary than in permanent teams, both for correct and incorrect majority decisions. The self-rated learning climate was more cooperative in permanent than in temporary teams, while intrinsic motivation and tRAT scores were similar for both types of teams. A poorer learning climate was associated with a higher proportion of discordant tRATs. CONCLUSION: Working in temporary teams does not lead to inferior intrinsic motivation; this was previously also shown for knowledge gain. However, the poorer learning climate, together with reaching a consensus less often, might indicate that at least some members of temporary teams feel not adequately appreciated in the discussion and do not accept the majority decision. With instructional strategies promoting a cooperative learning climate in temporary teams, preclinical TBL courses might serve as an early promoter of the relational team competencies required for subsequent clinical workplace learning in temporary teams

Cooperative learning · Randomized controlled trial · Team learning · Team-based learning · Teamwork · Innovations in Medical Education · Problem and Project Based Learning · Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare

  • Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being

    Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci•American Psychologist•2000

  • Short-term cognitive learning outcomes in team-based learning

    Open Access•Stefan Heber, Michaela Wagner‐Menghin et al.•Medical Education Online•2024

  • Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation

    Richard M Ryan, Valerie Mims et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere

    Richard M Ryan•Journal of Personality and Social…•1982

Altamente citadoNo
Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae