Reimagining sustainable futures through community–university partnerships as university social responsibility
Insights from developing the Positive Impact Partners programme
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21720617 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rebecca Brunk (University of Leeds Sustainability Service, , Leeds, autor de correspondencia), Rishabh Bezbaruah (University of Leeds School of Mathematics, , Leeds), Stella Darby (0009-0005-2734-4326, University of Leeds School of Geography, , Leeds) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Páginas | 1-19 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-06-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1467-6370 • E-ISSN: 1758-6739 |
| Editorial | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/ijshe-11-2025-1357 |
| OpenAlex | W7164926976 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 26 |
Purpose This paper aims to consider how universities can strengthen their social responsibility commitments through community–university partnerships (CUPs) to advance the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Focusing on the development of the Positive Impact Partners (PIP) programme at the University of Leeds, UK, it explores how engagement with community sustainability practitioners shaped the programme’s design and revealed barriers to equitable collaboration. Design/methodology/approach Using a qualitative, participatory approach, this study involved two focus groups with community sustainability practitioners and academic researchers to explore barriers and enablers to partnership. Reflexive thematic analysis identified key structural and relational challenges, which were then used by the research team to inform PIP’s development. Findings Findings indicate that structural, epistemic and resource barriers limit equitable collaboration, and that these barriers exist within both individual partnerships and at the institution level. The design of PIP responded to these challenges through dedicated partnership officers, joint bid development support and mechanisms for co-defining priorities with community partners. Practical implications This paper argues that embedding relational brokerage and partnership infrastructure can make USR commitments more actionable. It offers practical insights for universities seeking to operationalise SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals) and strengthen civic impact through locally grounded, trust-based co-creation. Originality/value This paper contributes to scholarship linking CUP literature to the field of sustainability and uses the co-development process of PIP to illustrate how universities can design partnership structures that embed inclusive and participatory principles into university social responsibility for sustainability co-creation
Citizen journalism · Engaged scholarship · Focus group · General partnership · Participatory action research · Reflexivity · Scholarship · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Higher Education Practises and Engagement · Service-Learning and Community Engagement · Sustainability in Higher Education
Beyond the third mission
Behaviour change to address climate change
A theory of participation
Aligning community outreach initiatives with SDGs in a higher education institution with artificial intelligence
Envisioning the Indigenised university for sustainable development
Community needs and interests in university–community partnerships for sustainable development
University social responsibility and sustainability. How they work on the SDGS and how they communicate them on their websites
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Developing local ‘communities of practice’ through local community – university partnerships
The conceptualisation of socially responsible universities in higher education research
Effects of trust and public participation on acceptability of renewable energy projects in the Netherlands and China
The role of universities in SDGs solution co-creation and implementation
The Challenges of Collaboration for Academic and Community Partners in a Research Partnership
Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations
The new politics of climate change
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |