Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Female Fantastic vs. The Feminist Fantastic

Gender and the Transgression of the Real

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21728949
AutoresDavid ROAS (0000-0003-0290-0646, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, autor de correspondencia)
Año2021
Volumen22
Número4
Fecha de publicación2021-03-14
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCLCWeb Comparative Literature and Culture (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1481-4374 • E-ISSN: 1481-4374
EditorialPurdue University (bepress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.7771/1481-4374.3690
OpenAlexW3138766570
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas4

Since Ann Richter coined the term “fantastique féminin” in 1977, many works in different languages have postulated a “female” way of writing fantastic texts, depending on the selection of themes, language, characters, supernatural elements, and the portrayal of the uncanny and the monstrous. This claim on the existence of a "female fantastic" reflects central issues in Feminist Literary Theory: on the one hand, the will to identify an aesthetic mode opposed to the dominant patriarchal discourse (female writing, the use of specific themes, etc.); on the other hand, the argument that there are marginal genres, forms and styles voluntarily removed from the central canon (this would also apply to the fantastic written by men). This article offers a review of the theoretical viability of the main works on this subject to show how most of them define the fantastic in terms of recurring themes that, paradoxically, tend to also appear in the works of male authors. Much more productive and more viable from a theoretical point of view is to study the "feminist fantastic" (this is the central thesis of this article), given the tendency of a significant number of women writers to use the fantastic as an element of destabilization of cultural, ideological and political characteristics and values of patriarchy

Aesthetics · Art · Feminism · Ideology · Literature · Patriarchy · Politics · Sociology · Uncanny · Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity · Gender Studies · Latin American Literature Analysis · Law · Themes in Literature Analysis

  • “Imagining Differently”

    Open Access•Patrycja Antoszek•Roczniki Humanistyczne•2023

  • Nuevos caminos en la teoría de lo fantástico

    Open Access•David ROAS•Theory Now Journal of Literature…•2021

  • The Female Fantastic vs. The Feminist Fantastic

    Open Access•David ROAS•CLCWeb Comparative Literature and…•2021

  • “The vixens, the she-wolves, the birds, the witches”

    Open Access•Majo Delgadillo•Revista 2i | Estudos de…•2025

  • The Madwoman in the Attic

    Sandra M Gilbert, Susan Gubar•The Madwoman in the Attic•1980

  • The Female Fantastic vs. The Feminist Fantastic

    Open Access•David ROAS•CLCWeb Comparative Literature and…•2021

  • Fantasy and Mimesis

    Kathryn Hume•Poetics Today•1985

  • Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness

    Elaine Showalter•Critical Inquiry•1981

Obras citantes distintas4
Citas por año0,8
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2025 (5)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae