Practising collaboration in model implementation in physical education
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21783926 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lars Bjørke (0000-0003-2328-8919, University of Inland Norway, autor de correspondencia), Andrea Casey (0000-0002-8232-5727, Loughborough University) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 29 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 491-504 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-09-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1740-8989 • E-ISSN: 1742-5786 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17408989.2022.2125945 |
| OpenAlex | W4297058947 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
| Referencias citadas | 27 |
Background: Over the last two decades, teachers’ use of models has been frequently highlighted as a possible future for physical education. Literature has also shown that collaborations between teachers and researchers can be effective in supporting teachers not only to successfully implement but also sustain their long-term use of models Despite this evidence, the practice of collaboration itself has so far, at best, been an implicit focus for investigation and the ways in which collaborations are practised seem to vary.Purpose: In this paper, we argue that there is a need to move beyond stating that collaborations work and understand more about the different ways collaborations between teachers and researchers might be practised. We do so by presenting three empirical illustrations which represent different collaborative practices and discuss the consequences these have for teachers’ implementation of models.Methods: The empirical illustrations draw on data from teacher interviews, recorded workshops and the first author’s reflective research diary collected over a two-year collaborative project. Through a cyclical and iterative process of analysing the data we identified three ways in which the practice of collaboration was practised: ‘the researcher knows best’, ‘basing learning on the needs of the teachers’ and ‘the end of the beginning’. To further our understanding and discuss the consequences of these practices, we used practice architectures , models-as-specification versus models-as-prescriptionand fidelity to procedure versus fidelity to goals as theoretical concepts.Illustrations: The ‘researcher knows best’ illustration represents a collaboration in which the researcher believes they know best about what the teachers should learn and what they would benefit from most. Hence, the researcher provided knowledge about how and why pedagogical models could be implemented, without consulting the teachers. The second illustration, ‘basing the learning on the needs of the teachers’ investigates how the researcher tried to learn from their on-going experiences and adjust the way they approached the collaboration with the teachers, to increase the level of teacher autonomy. The third illustration, ‘the end of the beginning’ shows a collaboration in which the researcher deliberately took a more peripheral role. This allowed the teachers to decide both on what they needed to learn and how this could be achieved.Conclusions: Although our theoretical concepts allowed us to problematize different aspects of all these practices, it is not our ambition to say that there is a right or wrong way of working together to enable teachers to implement models. Indeed, we suggest that to collaborate is something that needs to be continuously practised by both teachers and researchers to respond to the different needs at different times in the process of collaboration. In conclusion, we suggest that planning for collaborations that; (1) allow models to be considered as specifications for practices and (2) allow fidelity to be considered in relation to the overall purpose of the model, could serve as two guiding principles for future collaborations
Best practice · Empirical research · Epistemology · Fidelity · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Political science · Computer Science · Engineering · Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Physical Education and Pedagogy · Psychology
An in-depth analysis of two physical education teachers’ individual and collaborative reflective practices while learning to implement the SKIP curriculum
A model fidelity check in cooperative learning research in physical education
The ghosts of research past, present and future
Enhancing early childhood motor skills through teacher-focused video-based instruction and expert consultations
Barriers to collaboration among female technical university administrators
“Look at Yourself”
Contract teaching as a liminal bridge
Inclusion of Students With Disabilities in Physical Education
Researchers as actors
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
Changing Practices, Changing Education
Models-based practice
Situating praxis in practice
Innovation with change
A review of research on Sport Education
A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006
Fidelity in Models-Based Practice Research in Sport Pedagogy
Toward the Development of a Pedagogical Model for Health-Based Physical Education
Cooperative learning in physical education
Between hope and happening
Social media as a tool for generating sustained and in-depth insights into sport and exercise practitioners’ ongoing practices
Learning communities and physical education professional development
Influence of occupational socialization on beginning teachers’ interpretation and delivery of sport education
While we may lead a horse to water we cannot make him drink’
Appreciative inquiry for physical education and sport pedagogy research
Teaching personal and social responsibility model-based programmes in physical education
It’s how PE should be!’
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 9 |