Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Ethics Review of AI research

An approach to reviewing and revising existing governance structures

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21787618
AutoresAngeliki Kerasidou (0000-0001-9344-3297, University of Oxford, autor de correspondencia), Karen Melham (0000-0002-9581-4618, University of Oxford), Alberto Giubilini (0000-0001-5163-3017, University of Oxford), Charalampia Kerasidou (0000-0002-9794-8492, University of Oxford), Federica Lucivero (0000-0002-1308-5846, University of Oxford), Michael Morrison (0000-0001-6870-6673, University of Oxford), Antoniya Georgieva (0000-0002-5543-6683, University of Oxford), Andrew J Fletcher (0000-0003-2182-1089, University of Oxford), Mirae Harford (0000-0003-2851-1577, University of Oxford), Casey L Johnson (0009-0007-8972-8610, University of Oxford), Casey Johnson (University of Oxford), Jonathan Kaye (0000-0002-7311-4725, University of Oxford), Jane Kaye (University of Oxford), Robert M Klassen (0000-0002-1127-5777, University of Oxford), Robert Klassen (University of Oxford), Paul Leeson (University of Oxford), Fatima Ndanusa (University of Oxford), Christoffer Nellåker (0000-0002-2887-2068, University of Oxford), Alex Novak (University of Oxford), Daniel O’Connor (0000-0002-6902-9886, University of Oxford), John Powell (0000-0001-6124-439X, University of Oxford), Nabila Puspakesuma (0000-0003-3517-9103, University of Oxford), Sara Ratner (0000-0001-5145-4799, University of Oxford), Andrzej Rys (European Union), Abram Schonfeldt (University of Oxford), Andrew A S Soltan (0000-0003-2391-5361, University of Oxford), Carolyn Ten Holter (0000-0001-8739-3211, University of Oxford), Peter Thomson (0000-0002-0697-1866, University of Oxford), Patrick Thomson (University of Oxford)
Año2026
Volumen22
Número2
Páginas357-370
Fecha de publicación2026-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaResearch Ethics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1747-0161 • E-ISSN: 2047-6094
EditorialSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/17470161251406299
OpenAlexW4417424198
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas37

The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), and data science more broadly, have led to a proliferation of new methods and tools, such as machine learning (ML), that are used in all kinds of scientific research, from biomedical research through to environmental and education research. Research ethics review bodies are increasingly required to review AI research protocols that cover these different fields of enquiry. Questions have been raised regarding the appropriateness of existing ethics governance principles, practices, and processes to deal with the ethical challenges that AI and data science are introducing to research. Universities and research institutions across the world are trying to understand how to translate and practically implement broad AI ethical principles into research ethics governance guidelines and processes. In this article, we report on an expert stakeholders’ workshop organised at the University of Oxford as part of the process of reviewing its ethics governance for AI research. We describe the workshop and present the reflections and recommendations that emerged from it. The aim of the article is to share the approach taken by the University of Oxford CUREC in reviewing its ethics governance processes, and the insights gained with the broader research community, as a way of contributing to this scarce body of literature, facilitating further dialogue, promoting debate and collaboration on this important issue

Corporate governance · Ethical issues · Information ethics · Research ethics · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Ethics in Clinical Research

  • Control Paradox

    Ezio Di Nucci•Control Paradox•2020

  • Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Hanchen Wang, Tianfan Fu et al.•Nature•2023

  • Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education

    Open Access•Jason Borenstein, Ayanna Howard•AI and Ethics•2021

  • The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines

    Open Access•Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca et al.•Nature Machine Intelligence•2019

  • Evaluating the prospects for university-based ethical governance in artificial intelligence and data-driven innovation

    Open Access•C Hine•Research Ethics•2021

  • AI research ethics is in its infancy

    Open Access•Anaïs Rességuier, Fabienne Ufert•Research Ethics•2024

  • Can we Bridge AI’s responsibility gap at Will

    Open Access•Maximilian Kiener•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2022

  • Implementing Ethics in Healthcare AI-Based Applications

    Open Access•Magali Goirand, Elizabeth Austin et al.•Science and Engineering Ethics•2021

  • The Role of Exceptionalism in the Evolution of Bioethical Regulation

    Open Access•Sergei Shevchenko, Alexey Zhavoronkov•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2024

  • AI, big data, and the future of consent

    Open Access•Adam J Andreotta, Nin Kirkham et al.•AI & Society•2022

  • There Is No Techno-Responsibility Gap

    Open Access•Daniel W Tigard•Philosophy & Technology•2021

  • Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Filippo Santoni de Sio, Giulio Mecacci•Philosophy & Technology•2021

  • The ethics of AI in health care

    Open Access•Jessica Morley, Caio C Vieira Machado et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • From What to How

    Open Access•Jessica Morley, Luciano Floridi et al.•Science and Engineering Ethics•2019

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae