Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Prometheus Bound and Sophocles’ Inachos

New Perspectives

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21819403
AutoresKyriakos Tsantsanoglou (autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen12
Número2
Páginas267-296
Fecha de publicación2020-11-24
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaTrends in Classics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1866-7473 • E-ISSN: 1866-7481
EditorialWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/tc-2020-0017
OpenAlexW3108460235
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas22

The paper consists of three chapters. In the first, Soph. Inachos fr. 269c.16–24 is presented as the earliest testimony to the authenticity of Prometheus Bound ( PV ). The verses declare that the one of the elders who named here Hermes trókhis was wise. The word describing mockingly Hermes was employed only in PV 941. And it is very unlikely that Sophocles would name ‘wise predecessor here’, i. e. in the theater, any other tragedian than Aeschylus. In the second chapter, the numerous divergences from Aeschylean practice are explained by reference to the fourth-place drama, which was usually covered by the satyr-play, but frequently with other plays aimed at the uneducated and unrefined spectators. Thus, PV is dated in 472 BC, contemporary with the Persae , in whose didascalia Προμηθεύς is named as the fourth drama of the production. It is unanimously identified with the satyr-play Προμηθεὺς Πυρκαεύς, but the author identifies it with PV , which as a fourth-place drama presents many stylistic peculiarities. Προμηθεὺς Πυρκαεύς is then the satyr-play of the Prometheus tetralogy that was staged not long after 472. It is possible that Aeschylus restaged PV in Syracuse at the same time as Persae . A relationship with Pindar’s Pyth . 1 and with Epicharmus reinforces the dating in 472. The third chapter deals with the problem of the third speaking actor in the prologue of PV . The problem is approached through the technical contrivance of ὀκρίβας, which also answers the question of frontality in the staging of the prologue

Art · Drama · Literature · Prologue · Classical Antiquity Studies · History · Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods · Philosophy

  • The authenticity of "Prometheus bound"

    Mark Ph D Griffith•The authenticity of "Prometheus…•1977

  • Satyric Play

    CARL SHAW•Satyric Play•2014

  • The stagecraft of Aeschylus

    Oliver Taplin•The stagecraft of Aeschylus•1989

  • The Author of the Prometheus Bound

    C J Herington•Author of the Prometheus Bound•1970

  • Sophocles

    Open Access•Sophocles ca v Chr v Chr, Patrick Finglass et al.•Sophocles•2018

  • The Papyrus Fragments of Sophocles

    Sophocles Sophocles, Richard Carden•Papyrus Fragments of Sophocles•1974

  • Palintonos Harmonia

    Bernd Seidensticker•Palintonos Harmonia•1982

  • Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Vol. IV

    Stefan Radt•Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta.…•1999

  • A Problem in the Tebtunis Inachus-Fragment

    Open Access•Hugh Lloyd-Jones•The Classical Review•1965

  • Sentence Structure in Aeschylus and the Position of the Prometheus in the Corpus Aeschyleum

    Susan Ireland•Philologus•1977

  • The Date of the Prometheus Bound

    Everard Flintoff•Mnemosyne•1986

  • Studies in Aeschylus

    Martin L West•Studies in Aeschylus•1990

  • The Lyric Metres of Greek Drama

    Richmond Lattimore, A M Dale•The American Journal of Philology•1951

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae