Stewarding Covid-19 health systems response in Pakistan
What more can be done for a primary health care approach to future pandemics
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21880720 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Shehla Zaidi (0000-0001-7620-9247, Aga Khan University), Raza Zaidi (0009-0002-1201-3653, Ministry of National Health Services Regulation and Coordination), Shujaat Hussain (0000-0001-6607-2814, Aga Khan University), Malik Muhammad Safi (Ministry of National Health Services Regulation and Coordination) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 10 |
| Número | Suppl 2 |
| Páginas | e016149 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | BMJ Global Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908 |
| Editorial | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016149 |
| PMID | 39800384 |
| OpenAlex | W4406282618 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 22 |
We apply a primary healthcare (PHC) perspective to gauge Pakistan’s health systems response to COVID-19, to identify stewardship lessons for integrating the PHC pandemic response. Analysis of Pakistan’s response against the Astana PHC framework shows that the imperative for national survival helped mobilise an agile response across a fragmented health security context. The findings show effective multisector governance in responding to the health and social aspects of the pandemic, as well as the rapid roll-out of several public health functions and emergency care. However, we found weak maintenance of essential health services and ad hoc, short-lived efforts for community engagement. Critical enablers that helped steward the response across complex power-sharing arrangements included solidarity across society, collaborative data-driven decision-making, leveraging of siloed domestic resources and private sector coordination. At the same time, a more PHC-centric response was constrained by weak political prioritisation of essential health services, uneven services, weak direction to civil society volunteerism for community engagement and weak regulation of private sector contribution. We conclude that a mindset shift is required from short-term tactical measures to long-term investment in PHC-oriented transformative stewardship. Future preparedness must build attention to essential service package for emergencies, mobilisation of both private and public primary care providers, effective community engagement vision across societal actors and market regulation, within a collaborative governance framework
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Disease · Health care · Outbreak · Pandemic · Political science · Primary health care · Public health · COVID-19 and healthcare impacts · COVID-19 and Mental Health · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Medicine · Nursing · Virology
The Role of the Private Sector in the Covid-19 Pandemic
The Role of Contextual Factors in Private Sector Engagement
An overview of Iran's actions in response to the Covid-19 pandemic and in building health system resilience
Impact of the societal response to Covid-19 on access to healthcare for non-Covid-19 health issues in slum communities of Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria and Pakistan
Stark choices
Country performance against Covid-19
Protecting essential health services in low-income and middle-income countries and humanitarian settings while responding to the Covid-19 pandemic
Leaving no one behind
Private sector engagement in the Covid-19 response
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |