Exploring Relationships Between Qualitative Student Evaluation Comments and Quantitative Instructor Ratings
A Structural Topic Modeling Framework
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22045595 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Nina Zipser (0000-0002-1431-1606, Harvard University Press, autor de correspondencia), Dmitry Kurochkin (Harvard University Press), Kwok Wah Yu (Harvard University), Lisa Mincieli (0000-0001-7971-8338, Harvard University Press) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 15 |
| Número | 8 |
| Páginas | 1011 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-08-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Editorial | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci15081011 |
| OpenAlex | W4413038103 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 24 |
This study demonstrates how Structural Topic Modeling (STM) can be used to analyze qualitative student comments in conjunction with quantitative student evaluation of teaching (SET) scores, providing a scalable framework for interpreting student evaluations of teaching. Drawing on 286,203 open-ended comments collected over fourteen years at a large U.S. research university, we identify eleven latent topics that characterize how students describe instructional experiences. Unlike traditional topic modeling methods, STM allows us to examine how topic prevalence varies with course and instructor attributes, including instructor gender, course discipline, enrollment size, and numeric SET scores. To illustrate the utility of the model, we show that topic prevalence aligns with SET ratings in expected ways and that students associate specific teaching attributes with instructor gender, though the effects are relatively small. Importantly, the direction and strength of topic–SET correlations are consistent across male and female instructors, suggesting shared student perceptions of effective teaching practices. Our findings underscore the potential of STM to contextualize qualitative feedback, support fairer teaching evaluations, inform institutional decision-making, and examine the relationship between qualitative student comments and numeric SET ratings
Mathematics education · Perception · Qualitative analysis · Qualitative research · Sociology · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Computer Science · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences · Psychology
Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research
What’s in a Name
Students' evaluations of university teaching
Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations
Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching
Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations
STM
Are There Gender Differences in Quantitative Student Evaluations of Instructors
Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching
Contradicting findings of gender bias in teaching evaluations
A framework for using SET when evaluating faculty
Interpreting Effect Sizes of Education Interventions
Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses
Gendered mundanities
Gender Bias in Student Evaluations
Gender, Teaching Evaluations, and Professional Success in Political Science
The Power of Feedback
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |