Unveiling mode effects in grade 1 vocabulary assessment
The intriguing influence of test mode
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22166374 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Susanne Seifert (0000-0001-5588-5115, University of Graz, autor de correspondencia), Lisa Paleczek (0000-0003-4688-2179, University of Graz), Martin Schöfl (0000-0002-7254-2621, Johannes Kepler University of Linz), Christoph Weber (0000-0002-6624-7909, Johannes Kepler University of Linz) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 9 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-07-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2024.1376805 |
| OpenAlex | W4400956254 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
Background Vocabulary knowledge plays a pivotal role in academic development, particularly among Grade 1 students. To support students in their academic development, effective assessment instruments in educational settings are crucial. The GraWo (Graz Vocabulary Test) is introduced as a tool designed to evaluate receptive vocabulary in German-speaking countries in print and in digital mode. Objectives This study aims to investigate mode effects in the GraWo among Grade 1 students, comparing vocabulary gains in digital and print versions. Additionally, it explores the influence of student characteristics, such as gender and language status, and examines item-level differences between the two modes in order to gain a more comprehensive understanding of test performance. Design The research design entails a longitudinal approach, following children ( n = 421) from the beginning to the end of Grade 1, varying the test modes (digital or print) only at second measurement (40% receiving the print version), while at first measurement all children worked with the digital version. Results Baseline comparisons of test mode groups indicated almost no significant differences. In terms of growth in vocabulary during Grade 1, an ANOVA with repeated measures revealed a main effect for time, indicating increased performance in both groups at second measurement. Moreover, an interaction effect between time and test mode group showed that the print group exhibited higher gains in the vocabulary test compared to the digital group. Further analysis using MNLFA confirmed that the print mode group outperformed the digital group overall and that four items were also individually affected by differences between the digital and print versions. Conclusion The study emphasizes the need for nuanced investigations into the impact of test mode on student performance and suggests incorporating observational methods to comprehensively understand student interactions with digital and print modes. In acknowledging potential variations in performance, educators and policymakers need to tailor practices to accommodate the demands of hybrid test procedures and to consider the role of digital competence in shaping testing experiences
German · Human–computer interaction · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Vocabulary · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Gender and Technology in Education · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development
Rapid “Automatized” Naming of Pictured Objects, Colors, Letters and Numbers by Normal Children
The lexical quality hypothesis
Comparing tablet and print mode of a german reading comprehension test in grade 3
Assessing children's reading comprehension on paper and screen
Low-stakes performance testing in Germany by the Vera assessment
Revisión sistemática sobre el uso de la tableta en la etapa de educación primaria
Comparing digital to print assessment of receptive vocabulary with GraWo‐KiGa in Austrian kindergarten
Tablet assessment in primary education
What makes the difference? The impact of item properties on mode effects in reading assessments
A Meta-Analysis of Testing Mode Effects in Grade K-12 Mathematics Tests
Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K–12 Reading Assessments
Equivalence of Screen Versus Print Reading Comprehension Depends on Task Complexity and Proficiency
Comparison of paper‐pencil and online performances of students with learning disabilities
Phonemes, Rimes, Vocabulary, and Grammatical Skills as Foundations of Early Reading Development
Reading comprehension and its underlying components in second-language learners
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |