Alternatives' to austerity
A critique of financialized infrastructure in India and beyond
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2247758 |
|---|---|
| Autores | L Bear (0000-0003-1718-8129, Renewable Energy Systems (United States), autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 33 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 3-7 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Anthropology Today (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0268-540X • E-ISSN: 1467-8322 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-8322.12376 |
| OpenAlex | W2622219303 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 19 |
| Referencias citadas | 12 |
Current infrastructure development across the globe is described as an 'alternative' to austerity and as a nationalist riposte to globalization. From the UK to India to the US, it is represented as a way of reviving the fortunes of the 'common man' and a dispossessed, male working class. This article, based on research in the waterscape of the Hooghly River in India and World Bank initiatives, argues that current policies of financialized infrastructure are a false alternative to austerity and are a continuation of a longer historical process. These policies have emerged from the gradual movement of fiscal control from governments to central banks, commercial banks and financial markets. This began with the financialization of sovereign debt in the 1980s-90s, which led to fiscal constraint within the public sector. Such policies eroded the material forms of state-provided public works and led to private sector accumulation through public-private partnerships and financial market speculation. Now governments are turning to commercial banks and financial markets to solve the problem of infrastructures starved of capital, even though it is the governance of the economy through these networks that has generated the current 'infrastructure deficit'. Anthropologists now need to take part in public debates by revealing the financial predation on infrastructures and arguing for a renaming of them as citizens' commons for the public good. Ultimately, it is through a combination of ethnographies of austerity and analyses of the political economy of finance that anthropologists can challenge current inequalities
Austerity · Capitalism · Debt · Economic growth · Economics · Economy · Financialization · Globalization · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Private sector · Public sector · Speculation · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Urban Planning and Governance · Water Governance and Infrastructure · Finance
The anthropology of infrastructure
Reconfiguring labour and welfare in the Global South
Intimacy and Estrangement
Financing large-scale renewable-energy projects in Kenya
Splintering Urbanism and Climate Breakdown
Making heterogeneous infrastructure futures in and beyond the global south
The Long Rise of Private Finance in Development and the Implications for Policymakers
Contact Zones of Climate Preconstruction in Coastal Africa
Cities of the Global South
Contract as frontier device, or, the political publics of water infrastructures
Projects of transition
Life as debt, or debt to life? Water, finance and infrastructure
A journey through 'infraspace
Commonwealth
Introduction
The State of the Welfare State
Owing Everyone
Disrupted dreams of development
Human ATMs
Navigating Austerity
Money from Nothing
Democracy's Infrastructure
Post-Soviet Social
Derivatives and the financialisation of the Italian state
How much can governments borrow? Financialization and emerging markets government borrowing capacity
Roads
Hydraulic City
Tax increment financing, economic development professionals and the financialization of urban politics
The Right to Infrastructure
Performing neoliberal governmentality
| Obras citantes distintas | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2,38 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 18 |