Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The many meanings of care in clinical research

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2265786
AutoresMichele M Easter (0000-0003-4294-4133, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Gail E Henderson (0000-0002-4968-7064, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Arlene M Davis (0000-0001-6486-0446, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Larry R Churchill (Ethics and Public Policy Center), Nancy M P King (0000-0001-9460-7484, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Año2006
Volumen28
Número6
Páginas695-712
Fecha de publicación2006-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00537.x
PMID17184413
OpenAlexW1486943396
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas33
Referencias citadas39

The conduct of clinical research often involves two distinguishable sets of relationships: the researcher-subject relationship, and the clinician-patient relationship. Some scholars argue that being a patient in a clinical care setting and a subject in a research study are so different that anything that would promote in subjects the view that they are in clinician-patient relationships is exploitative and deceptive. This paper presents findings intended to initiate a more empirically-based discussion of this issue. Using data from 82 in-depth interviews with physician-investigators, nurse-study coordinators and patient-subjects in early phase clinical trials, we find that research personnel are likely to be seen, and to see themselves, as clinical caregivers. We also find evidence that while researchers and subjects often tend to view care and research as conflicting activities, both parties tend to see research as a way of caring for patients. We found no relationship, however, between subjects' perception of care-giving by researchers and the tendency to misunderstand that they are in a research study. Because research, by necessity and inclination, is unlikely ever to be 'care-free', we recommend that the ethical debate surrounding the danger of confusing research with treatment take into account the kinds of care described by respondents

Clinical research · Clinical trial · Perception · Subject (documents · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Medicine · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Between Neutrality and Engagement

    Open Access•M N Svendsen, Lene Koch•BioSocieties•2008

  • Developing Clinical Research Relationship

    Open Access•Olga Zvonareva, Lloyd Akrong•Developing World Bioethics•2015

  • Navigating the dual role of physician and clinician investigator in end-of-life research

    Open Access•Robert Dei, Robert Deiss et al.•AIDS Care•2025

  • The unheard path

    Open Access•Fred Cooper•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Beyond the ‘therapeutic misconception’

    Open Access•Sarah Wadmann, Klaus Hoeyer•BioSocieties•2014

  • Balancing methodological purity and social relevance

    Open Access•Jonas Winther, Line Hillersdal•BioSocieties•2020

  • (Re)configuring research value

    Open Access•Olga Zvonareva, Nora Engel et al.•BioSocieties•2017

  • Choisir le risque

    Open Access•Besle, Aline Sarradon-Eck•Anthropologie et santé•2019

  • French Public Familiarity and Attitudes toward Clinical Research during the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Emily Schultz, Jeremy K Ward et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Extending experimentation

    Open Access•Alberto Cambrosio, P Keating et al.•New Genetics and Society•2018

  • Une « illusion thérapeutique » ? Reconfigurations locales de la recherche clinique sur le VIH au Sénégal

    Mathilde Couderc•Autrepart•2013

  • Therapeutic Misperceptions in Early‐Phase Cancer Trials

    Open Access•Bryan A Sisk, Eric Kodish•IRB Ethics and Human Research•2018

  • Motivations for the ‘gift-of-care’ in the context of the modernisation of medicine

    Open Access•Sara Macbride‐stewart•Social Theory & Health•2013

  • The bioethical misconception

    Open Access•Tara Mckay, Stefan Timmerman•Social Science & Medicine•2009

  • In the mood for science

    Open Access•M N Svendsen, Lene Koch•Social Science & Medicine•2011

  • Les paradoxes du care dans les essais cliniques de phase I en oncologie

    Benjamin Derbez•Sciences sociales et santé•2018

  • Paradoxes of care in phase I cancer clinical trials

    Benjamin Derbez•Sciences sociales et santé•2018

  • Ethics in action

    Mareike Helena Smolka•2022

  • Blinding Authority

    Open Access•Bob Simpson, Sakari Sariola et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2012

  • The Co-production of Science, Ethics, and Emotion

    Open Access•Martyn Pickersgill•Science Technology & Human Values•2012

  • Clinical trials as treatment option

    Open Access•Stefan Timmerman, Tara Mckay•Social Science & Medicine•2009

  • Wicked' ethics

    Open Access•Carol A Heimer•Social Science & Medicine•2013

  • Participating in Research

    Open Access•Karen Willis, Karen F Willis et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2011

  • Understanding the outcomes of multi-centre clinical trials

    Open Access•Julia Lawton, Nicholas Jenkins et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • Flexible positions, managed hopes

    Open Access•Rachel Haase, Marsha Michie et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2015

  • Distinguishing research from clinical care in cancer genetics

    Open Access•Nina Hallowell, Sarah Cooke et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2009

  • Hegemony in the marketplace of biomedical innovation

    Open Access•B Salter, Yinhua Zhou et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2015

  • International clinical trials, cardiovascular disease and treatment options in the Russian Federation

    Open Access•Olga Zvonareva, Nora Engel et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2015

  • They should take time

    Open Access•Aline Sarradon-Eck, Juliette Sakoyan et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • Utiliser la recherche pour soigner le cancer

    Besle, Sylvain Besle et al.•Revue Française de Sociologie•2021

  • Careful science? Bodywork and care practices in randomised clinical trials

    Open Access•Astrid Pernille Jespersen, Julie Bønnelycke et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2014

  • Mutual Benefit, Added Value

    Catherine M Will, Catherine Will•Journal of Cultural Economy•2011

  • Clean Blood, Religion, and Moral Triage in Tuberculosis Vaccine Trials

    Justin Dixon, Michèle Tameris•Medical Anthropology•2018

  • The Managed Heart

    Arlie Russell Hochschild•Managed Heart•2012

  • The therapeutic misconception

    Open Access•Paul S Appelbaum, Peter Appelbaum et al.•International Journal of Law and…•1982

  • Critical Bioethics

    Open Access•Adam Hedgecoe, Adam M Hedgecoe•Bioethics•2004

  • Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials

    Open Access•Steven Joffe, E Francis Cook et al.•The Lancet•2001

  • Qualitative Data Analysis in Health Psychology

    Toby Ro Newton-John, Toby Newton‐john•Qualitative Data Analysis in…•2018

  • The Ancillary-Care Responsibilities of Medical Researchers

    Henry S Richardson, Leah Belsky•The Hastings Center Report•2004

  • Trust

    Norman Ka, Nancy E Kass et al.•The Hastings Center Report•1996

  • Phase I Cancer Trials

    Matthew Miller, Matthew M Miller•The Hastings Center Report•2000

  • A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Leon Festinger, Camille Morvan et al.•A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance•2017

  • The Managed Heart

    Arlie Russell Hochschild•Managed Heart•2003

  • Quantitative Analysis of Ethical Issues in Phase I Trials

    Christopher K Daugherty, Donald M Banik et al.•IRB Ethics and Human Research•2000

  • Science versus care

    Open Access•Mary‐Rose Mueller•Sociology of Health & Illness•1997

  • Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation

    Julius A Roth, Julius Roth et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1976

  • In a Different Voice

    Miriam M Johnson, Carol Gilligan•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1983

  • Ordered to Care

    Marilyn E Flood, Susan M Reverby•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1988

  • The Sociology of Medical Science and Technology

    Duane A Matcha, Mary Ann Elston•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1999

  • Understanding The Decision to Participate in a Survey

    Robert M Groves, Robert B Cialdini et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1992

  • The Role-Set

    Robert Κ Merton, Robert K Merton•British Journal of Sociology•1957

  • Experiment Perilous

    H Warren Dunham, Richard C Fox et al.•American Sociological Review•1960

  • Integrating conflicting professional roles

    Open Access•Kathryn M Taylor•Social Science & Medicine•1992

  • Therapeutic misconception in early phase gene transfer trials

    Open Access•Gail E Henderson, Michele M Easter et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2006

  • From Faust to Strangelove

    George Basalla, Roslynn D Haynes•Technology and Culture•1996

  • Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation

    Daniel Sullivan, Daniel C Sullivan et al.•Social Forces•1976

  • Recent Developments in Role Theory

    Bruce J Biddle, B Biddle•Annual Review of Sociology•1986

  • Care = organisation + physical labour + emotional labour

    Open Access•Nicky James•Sociology of Health & Illness•1992

  • Sentimental work in the technologized hospital

    Open Access•Anselm Strau, Anselm Strauss et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•1982

Obras citantes distintas33
Citas por año1,83
Intervalo de citas2008 - 2026 (19)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 32
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae