What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23344263
AutoresY Wang (0000-0002-4822-6514, Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health (formerly the Department of Social and Preventive Medicine) School of Public Health and Health Professions University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo NY USA), L Cai (0000-0002-5599-4183, Johns Hopkins Global Center on Childhood Obesity Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA), Y Wu (0000-0002-9374-7239, Johns Hopkins Global Center on Childhood Obesity Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA), R F Wilson (Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA), C Weston (Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA), O Fawole (Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA), S N Bleich (Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA), L J Cheskin (Department of Health, Behavior and Society Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA), N N Showell (Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA), B D Lau (Department of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA), D T Chiu (Johns Hopkins Global Center on Childhood Obesity Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA), A Zhang (0000-0003-4353-745X, Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA), J Segal (Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA)
Año2015
Volumen16
Número7
Páginas547-565
Fecha de publicación2015-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaObesity Reviews (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1467-7881 • E-ISSN: 1467-789X
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/obr.12277
PMID25893796
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas67
Referencias citadas159

Previous reviews of childhood obesity prevention have focused largely on schools and findings have been inconsistent. Funded by the US A gency for H ealthcare R esearch and Q uality ( AHRQ ) and the N ational I nstitutes of H ealth, we systematically evaluated the effectiveness of childhood obesity prevention programmes conducted in high‐income countries and implemented in various settings. We searched MEDLINE ®, E mbase, PsycINFO , CINAHL ®, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library from inception through 22 A pril 2013 for relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials, quasi‐experimental studies and natural experiments, targeting diet, physical activity or both, and conducted in children aged 2–18 in high‐income countries. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. The strength of evidence ( SOE ) supporting interventions was graded for each study setting (e.g. home, school). Meta‐analyses were performed on studies judged sufficiently similar and appropriate to pool using random effect models. This paper reported our findings on various adiposity‐related outcomes. We identified 147 articles (139 intervention studies) of which 115 studies were primarily school based, although other settings could have been involved. Most were conducted in the United States and within the past decade. SOE was high for physical activity‐only interventions delivered in schools with home involvement or combined diet–physical activity interventions delivered in schools with both home and community components. SOE was moderate for school‐based interventions targeting either diet or physical activity, combined interventions delivered in schools with home or community components or combined interventions delivered in the community with a school component. SOE was low for combined interventions in childcare or home settings. Evidence was insufficient for other interventions. In conclusion, at least moderately strong evidence supports the effectiveness of school‐based interventions for preventing childhood obesity. More research is needed to evaluate programmes in other settings or of other design types, especially environmental, policy and consumer health informatics‐oriented interventions.