Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23360697
AutoresShuchi Grover (0000-0001-6633-8862, Stanford University, autor de correspondencia), Roy Pea (0000-0001-6301-3536, Stanford University), Stephen Cooper (0000-0002-4397-736X, Stanford University)
Año2015
Volumen25
Número2
Páginas199-237
Fecha de publicación2015-04-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaComputer Science Education (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0899-3408 • E-ISSN: 1744-5175
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08993408.2015.1033142
OpenAlexW1818016653
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas57
Referencias citadas37

The focus of this research was to create and test an introductory computer science course for middle school. Titled “Foundations for Advancing Computational Thinking” (FACT), the course aims to prepare and motivate middle school learners for future engagement with algorithmic problem solving. FACT was also piloted as a seven-week course on Stanford’s OpenEdX MOOC platform for blended in-class learning. Unique aspects of FACT include balanced pedagogical designs that address the cognitive, interpersonal, and intrapersonal aspects of “deeper learning”; a focus on pedagogical strategies for mediating and assessing for transfer from block-based to text-based programming; curricular materials for remedying misperceptions of computing; and “systems of assessments” (including formative and summative quizzes and tests, directed as well as open-ended programming assignments, and a transfer test) to get a comprehensive picture of students’ deeper computational learning. Empirical investigations, accomplished over two iterations of a design-based research effort with students (aged 11–14 years) in a public school, sought to examine student understanding of algorithmic constructs, and how well students transferred this learning from Scratch to text-based languages. Changes in student perceptions of computing as a discipline were measured. Results and mixed-method analyses revealed that students in both studies (1) achieved substantial learning gains in algorithmic thinking skills, (2) were able to transfer their learning from Scratch to a text-based programming context, and (3) achieved significant growth toward a more mature understanding of computing as a discipline. Factor analyses of prior computing experience, multivariate regression analyses, and qualitative analyses of student projects and artifact-based interviews were conducted to better understand the factors affecting learning outcomes. Prior computing experiences (as measured by a pretest) and math ability were found to be strong predictors of learning outcomes.

Blended Learning · Course (navigation) · Educational technology · Instructional design · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Computer Science · Experimental Learning in Engineering · Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research · Psychology · Teaching and Learning Programming

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research

    Open Access•Sally A Fincher, Anthony V Robins•Cambridge Handbook of Computing…•2019

  • Demystifying computational thinking

    Open Access•Valerie J Shute, Chen Sun et al.•Educational Research Review•2017

  • How to learn and how to teach computational thinking

    Open Access•Ting-Chia Hsu, Shao‐Chen Chang et al.•Computers & Education•2018

  • A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9

    Open Access•Lechen Zhang, Jalal Nouri•Computers & Education•2019

  • Decoding agent-based models supports students’ mechanistic and causal reasoning about scientific phenomena

    Open Access•Irene Lee, Irene A Lee et al.•International Journal of STEM…•2026

  • Unpacking the sources of computer science teaching efficacy in in-service elementary teachers

    Ezgi Yesilyurt, Erdogan Kaya et al.•Computer Science Education•2026

  • The impact of teaching a graphical programming language before character-based programming on Japanese university students’ programming understanding

    Open Access•Masahiro Osogami, Kazumasa Ohkuma et al.•SN Social Sciences•2024

  • From co-design to co-adaptation

    Open Access•Quentin Biddy, Jennifer Jacobs et al.•Frontiers in Education•2026

  • Enhancing Computational Thinking of Deaf Students Using STEAM Approach

    Open Access•Saowaluck Kaewkamnerd, Alisa Suwannarat•Education Sciences•2025

  • Log-Based Analysis of Creativity in the Context of Computational Thinking

    Open Access•Rotem Israel‐Fishelson, Arnon Hershkovitz•Education Sciences•2024

  • How Do Elementary Students Apply Debugging Strategies in a Block-Based Programming Environment

    Open Access•Wei Yan, Feiya Luo et al.•Education Sciences•2025

  • Scaffolding vocational high school students’ computational thinking with cognitive and metacognitive prompts in learning about programmable logic controllers

    Ching‐Huei Chen, Tung-Kai Liu et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2023

  • Team Mensa

    Sarah Barksdale, Cassandra Scharber et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2022

  • Developing and Testing a Design-Based Learning Approach to Enhance Elementary Students’ Self-Perceived Computational Thinking

    Xing Li, Li Xing et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2023

  • Computational thinking in K-12 education. An insight through meta-analysis

    José Miguel Merino-Armero, José Antonio González-Calero et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2022

  • Using an automated assessment tool to explore difficulties of middle school students in introductory programming

    Yizhou Qian, James Daniel Lehman et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2022

  • Computational thinking practices

    Kyungbin Kwon, Minji Jeon et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2023

  • Learning to program in middle school

    Jill Denner, Emily Green et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2021

  • Promoting pupils’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy

    Open Access•Hongliang Ma, Mei Zhao et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2021

  • Localized learning content in software education

    Open Access•Seungmin Lee, Seung-Min Lee•Educational Technology Research…•2025

  • Developing effective and accessible activities to improve and assess computational thinking and engineering learning

    Open Access•Yue Yin, Soroush Khaleghi et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2022

  • Block-based versus text-based programming

    Open Access•Dan Sun, Chee‐Kit Looi et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2024

  • Exploring the influence of favorite projects on programming skill improvement

    Open Access•Erin Lian, Jiaju Lin et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2023

  • Fostering students’ computational thinking and mathematical learning through a Scratch-based probability module

    Open Access•Runyu Zhang, Shuhui Li et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2026

  • Effects of different types of cues and self-explanation prompts in instructional videos on deep learning

    Open Access•Xudong Zheng, Yunfei Ma et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2023

  • Expansive framing as pragmatic theory for online and hybrid instructional design

    Open Access•Daniel T Hickey, Grant T Chartrand et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2020

  • Elementary Students Learning Computer Programming

    Open Access•Tian Luo, Jilian Reynolds et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2022

  • Deeper learning as integrated knowledge and fascination for Science

    Siegmar Otto, Franziska Körner et al.•International Journal of Science…•2020

  • Item response analysis of computational thinking practices

    Open Access•Siu Cheung Kong, Yi Qing Wang•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • A meta-analysis of teaching and learning computer programming

    Open Access•Rebeca Scherer, Fazilat Siddiq et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2020

  • Monitoring cognitive development through the assessment of computational thinking practices

    Open Access•Siu Cheung Kong, Yiqing Wang et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2023

  • On the predictors of computational thinking and its growth at the high-school level

    Open Access•Josef Guggemos•Computers & Education•2021

  • Teacher agency and learner agency in teaching and learning a new school subject, Leaving Certificate Computer Science, in Ireland

    Open Access•Dylan Scanlon, Cornelia Connolly•Computers & Education•2021

  • Teachers’ computational thinking content knowledge

    Open Access•Sara Monteyne, Charlotte Struyve et al.•Computers & Education•2025

  • Mapping computational thinking through programming in K-12 education

    Open Access•Christina Tikva, Efthimios Tambouris•Computers & Education•2021

  • Learning to code and the acquisition of computational thinking by young children

    Open Access•Emily Relkin, Laura de Ruiter et al.•Computers & Education•2021

  • Assessing computational thinking

    Open Access•Xiaodan Tang, Yue Yin et al.•Computers & Education•2020

  • Latent profile analysis of primary students’ computational thinking concepts

    Open Access•Siu Cheung Kong, Ming Lai et al.•Computers & Education•2026

  • Understanding individual differences in computational thinking development of primary school students

    Open Access•Shuhan Zhang, Gary K W Wong•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2024

  • Which way of design programming activities is more effective to promote K‐12 students' computational thinking skills? A meta‐analysis

    Open Access•Lihui Sun, Linlin Hu et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2021

  • Customising a Three‐Stage Fade‐Out Scaffolding for Collaborative Programming Learning

    Open Access•Yiming Zhang, Yin‐Rong Zhang et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2025

  • Assessing middle school students’ computational thinking through mathematical modeling

    Open Access•Bahadır Yıldız, Fatma Nur Poyraz•The Journal of Educational Research•2026

  • Preservice teachers' learning by design through space construction in the metaverse

    Open Access•Sangmin‐Michelle Lee, Sung‐Yeon Kim•British Journal of Educational…•2025

  • Learning by making

    Open Access•María Florencia Morado, Ayelén Eva Melo et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2021

  • Makerspace activities in a school setting

    Open Access•Anders I Mørch, Ellen Egeland Flø et al.•Learning Culture and Social…•2023

  • Learning Computational Thinking Together

    Open Access•Gerald Ardito, Betül Czerkawski et al.•TechTrends•2020

  • Adaptter

    Open Access•Colette Kirwan, Eamon Costello et al.•TechTrends•2022

  • Teaching Programming Online

    Open Access•Nicole Shanley, Florence Martins et al.•TechTrends•2022

  • A Research-Practice Partnership Approach for Co-Designing a Culturally Responsive Computer Science Curriculum for Upper Elementary Students

    Open Access•Elena Novak, Javed Khan•TechTrends•2022

  • Parallel Instruction of Text-based and Block-based Programming

    Open Access•Minji Jeon, Kyungbin Kwon•TechTrends•2024

  • Drivers for the development of computational thinking in Costa Rican students

    Open Access•Karol Picado-Arce, Stefany Matarrita-Muñoz et al.•Comunicar•2021

  • Integrating Computational Thinking With the Curriculum of Future Professional Musicians

    Open Access•Marcella Mandanici, Simone Spagnol•IEEE Transactions on Education•2024

  • Constructing a Computational Thinking Evaluation Framework for Pupils

    Open Access•Yu-Sheng Su, Xiao Wang et al.•IEEE Transactions on Education•2024

  • An Experimental Study on the Association Between Affective States and Novice Programmers’ Performance

    Open Access•Hemilis Joyse Barbosa Rocha, Evandro de Barros Costa et al.•IEEE Transactions on Education•2025

  • Development and Validation of Computational Thinking Assessment of Chinese Elementary School Students

    Open Access•Li Yan, Shan Xu et al.•Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology•2021

  • Youth as philosophers of technology

    Sepehr Vakil, Maxine Mckinney De Royston•Mind Culture and Activity•2022

  • Computational Thinking and STEM in Agriculture Vocational Training

    Open Access•Eleftherios Chondrogiannis, Eleni Symeonaki et al.•European Journal of Investigation…•2021

  • Planning Early for Careers in Science

    Open Access•Robert H Tai, Christine Qi Liu et al.•Science•2006

  • Inventing to Prepare for Future Learning

    Daniel L Schwartz, Taylor Martin•Cognition and Instruction•2004

  • Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning

    Open Access•Christopher Dede, Chris Dede•Science•2009

  • Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases

    Daniel L Schwartz, Catherine C Chase et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2011

  • Learning and transfer

    Dedre Gentner, Jeffrey Loewenstein et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2003

  • Computational thinking for youth in practice

    Open Access•Irene Lee, Fred Martin et al.•ACM Inroads•2011

  • A Time For Telling

    Daniel L Schwartz, John D Bransford•Cognition and Instruction•1998

  • Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning?

    Richard E Mayer•American Psychologist•2004

  • Assessment and Classroom Learning

    Paul Black, Dylan Wiliam•Assessment in Education:…•1998

  • Those Who Understand

    Open Access•Lee S Shulman•Educational Researcher•1986

  • Possible selves

    Hazel Rose Markus, Hazel Markus et al.•American Psychologist•1986

  • Computational Thinking in K–12

    Open Access•Shuchi Grover, Roy Pea•Educational Researcher•2013

  • The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity

    Roy Pea, ROY D PEA•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2004

  • Design-Based Research

    Sasha A Barab, Sasha Barab et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2004

Obras citantes distintas57
Citas por año6,33
Intervalo de citas2017 - 2026 (10)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 57
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae