Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23378705
AutoresCalum F Leask (0000-0002-8011-2541, Glasgow Caledonian University, autor de correspondencia), Marlene Sandlund (0000-0003-4781-862X, Umeå University), Dawn A Skelton (0000-0001-6223-9840, Glasgow Caledonian University), Teatske M Altenburg (0000-0002-8764-5631, Amsterdam Public Health), Greet Cardon (0000-0003-4983-6557, Ghent University Hospital), Mai J M Chinapaw (0000-0001-6259-2441, Amsterdam Public Health), Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij (0000-0001-9969-7597, Ghent University Hospital), Maïté Verloigne (0000-0002-9048-3821, Ghent University Hospital), Sébastien Chastin (0000-0003-1421-9348, Glasgow Caledonian University), Sebastien F M Chastin
Año2019
Volumen5
Número1
Páginas2-2
Fecha de publicación2019-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaResearch Involvement and Engagement (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2056-7529 • E-ISSN: 2056-7529
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9
PMID30652027
OpenAlexW2920129527
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas138
Referencias citadas58

Background: Society has to cope with a large burden of health issues. There is need to find solutions to prevent diseases and help individuals live healthier lifestyles. Individual needs and circumstances vary greatly and one size fit all solutions do not tend to work well. More tailored solutions centred on individuals’ needs and circumstances can be developed in collaboration with these individuals. This process, known as co-creation, has shown promise but it requires guiding principles to improve its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to identify a key set of principles and recommendations for co-creating public health interventions. Methods: These principles were collaboratively developed through analysing a set of case studies targeting different health behaviours (such as reducing sitting and improving strength and balance) in different groups of people (such as adolescent schoolgirls and older adults living in the community). Results: The key principles of co-creation are presented in four stages: Planning (what is the purpose of the co-creation; and who should be involved?); Conducting (what activities can be used during co-creation; and how to ensure buy-in and commitment?); Evaluating (how do we know the process and the outcome are valid and effective?) and Reporting (how to report the findings?). Three models are proposed to show how co-created solutions can be scaled up to a population level. Conclusions: These recommendations aim to help the co-creation of public health interventions by providing a framework and governance to guide the process. Background: Due to the chronic disease burden on society, there is a need for preventive public health interventions to stimulate society towards a healthier lifestyle. To deal with the complex variability between individual lifestyles and settings, collaborating with end-users to develop interventions tailored to their unique circumstances has been suggested as a potential way to improve effectiveness and adherence. Co-creation of public health interventions using participatory methodologies has shown promise but lacks a framework to make this process systematic. The aim of this paper was to identify and set key principles and recommendations for systematically applying participatory methodologies to co-create and evaluate public health interventions. Methods: These principles and recommendations were derived using an iterative reflection process, combining key learning from published literature in addition to critical reflection on three case studies conducted by research groups in three European institutions, all of whom have expertise in co-creating public health interventions using different participatory methodologies. Results: Key principles and recommendations for using participatory methodologies in public health intervention co-creation are presented for the stages of: Planning (framing the aim of the study and identifying the appropriate sampling strategy); Conducting (defining the procedure, in addition to manifesting ownership); Evaluating (the process and the effectiveness) and Reporting (providing guidelines to report the findings). Three scaling models are proposed to demonstrate how to scale locally developed interventions to a population level. Conclusions: These recommendations aim to facilitate public health intervention co-creation and evaluation utilising participatory methodologies by ensuring the process is systematic and reproducible.

Business · Citizen journalism · Engineering ethics · Knowledge management · Management science · Process management · Psychological intervention · Public health · Public health interventions · World Wide Web · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Medicine · Nursing