Overcoming doubt

Developing CDoH Essentials, a practical tool to introduce the commercial determinants of health

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22945235
AutoresAlan Brooks (0000-0003-3771-3904, University of Bath , Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, autor de correspondencia), Katherine Körner (Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free Hospital , Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG), May Ci Van Schalkwyk (0000-0003-2210-2289, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH), Amy Barnes (0000-0002-8122-9792, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York , Heslington, New York, YO10 5DD), Mark Petticrew (0000-0002-6378-5517, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH)
Año2024
Volumen39
Número6
Fecha de publicación2024-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHealth Promotion International (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0957-4824 • E-ISSN: 1460-2245
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/heapro/daae166
PMID39573947
OpenAlexW4404620975
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas36

Despite growing awareness of the importance of commercial determinants of health (CDoH), there has been limited development or evaluation of educational and practice-focused support for public health professionals. This article reports findings from an action–research approach bringing together people with academic and practice expertise (n = 16) to co-create workshop materials (called ‘CDoH Essentials’), test and improve them through five trial workshops and explore their effects. Five English local public health teams co-facilitated the workshops in their organizations, with participants from public health teams and their internal partners (n = 94). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected throughout and analysed to understand: (1) whether the workshops met the expectations of participants, public health and academic observers, and (2) the effects of workshop participation on (a) participants’ knowledge, understanding and critical CDoH literacy, and (b) subsequent working practices and attitudes. The co-created CDoH Essentials appeared effective in meeting expectations, improving knowledge and critical CDoH literacy and promoting action on CDoH. The proportion of participants reporting ‘little’ or ‘no’ CDoH knowledge fell significantly following the workshop (55.4% vs 2.7%). Participants’ increased understanding supported reflection on the implications of the CDoH for their roles and for wider strategy and action. After 3 months, all five settings reported greater consideration of CDoH and had initiated or planned action. CDoH Essentials could be used to galvanize more effective public health action to tackle the CDoH in England and trialled in other public health contexts.

Action (physics) · Health care · Health literacy · Literacy · Medical education · Pedagogy · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Qualitative property · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Medicine · Nursing · Obesity and Health Practices · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Psychology