The Whys of Social Exclusion

Insights from Behavioral Economics

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23554147
AutoresKarla Hoff, James Walsh (0000-0002-8839-5865)
Año2017
Fecha de publicación2017-12-01
Open AccessNo
TipoBOOK
EditorialWorld Bank, Washington, DC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1596/1813-9450-8267
OpenAlexW3123351971
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3

All over the world, people are prevented from participating fully in society through mechanisms that go beyond the structural and institutional barriers identified by rational choice theory (poverty, exclusion by law or force, taste-based and statistical discrimination, and externalities from social networks). This essay discusses four additional mechanisms that bounded rationality can explain: (i) implicit discrimination, (ii) self-stereotyping and self-censorship, (iii) “fast thinking” adapted to underclass neighborhoods, and (iv) "adaptive preferences" in which an oppressed group views its oppression as natural or even preferred. Stable institutions have cognitive foundations -- concepts, categories, social identities, and worldviews -- that function like lenses through which individuals see themselves and the world. Abolishing or reforming a discriminatory institution may have little effect on these lenses. Groups previously discriminated against by law or policy may remain excluded through habits of the mind. Behavioral economics recognizes forces of social exclusion left out of rational choice theory, and identifies ways to overcome them. Some interventions have had very consequential impact.

Behavioral economics · Bounded rationality · Economics · Externality · Oppression · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Poverty · Rationality · Social exclusion · Sociology · Statistical discrimination · Underclass · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology