Contemporary friendships and social vulnerability among youth
Understanding the role of online and offline contexts of interaction in friendship quality
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2925852 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Riley A Scott (0000-0002-8578-4144, Griffith University, autor de correspondencia), Jaimee Stuart (0000-0002-4376-1913, Griffith University), Bonnie L Barber (0000-0002-8799-8453, Griffith University) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 38 |
| Número | 12 |
| Páginas | 3451-3471 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0265-4075 • E-ISSN: 1460-3608 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/02654075211029384 |
| OpenAlex | W3181222075 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 17 |
| Referencias citadas | 64 |
The prevalence of internet-connected devices in everyday life means that social interactions now frequently take place online. However, for socially vulnerable youth, it may be particularly important to examine distinctions between online and offline contexts of friendships. The current study sought to increase understanding of friendships in the digital era by exploring the associations of social anxiety and loneliness with frequency of interactions with friends, and in turn, friendship quality, as moderated by primary context of interaction with friends (online, offline, or equally online and offline). A sample of Australian young adults ( N = 658; 59.8% female; M age = 19.41, SD = 2.04) who reported having friendships conducted across both online and offline contexts were included in the study. A serial mediation model tested the effects of social anxiety on perceptions of friendship quality, through loneliness and frequency of interacting with friends. The findings suggest that social vulnerabilities are negatively associated with friendship quality for young adults who primarily interact with friends offline or both online and offline. However, among those who primarily interact with friends online, social vulnerabilities are not significantly associated with friendship quality. These results provide insight into contemporary friendships and highlight how social vulnerabilities are associated with perceptions of friendship quality across online and offline settings
Anxiety · Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · Friendship · Loneliness · Mediation · Online and offline · Perception · Quality (philosophy · Social anxiety · Sociology · Vulnerability (computing · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Media Influence and Health · Psychology · Social Psychology
Digital Relationality and Emotional Well‐Being
The Problem of Gendered Emojis in Online Communication Platforms
What Predicts Online Disinhibition? Examining Perceptions of Protection and Control Online and the Moderating Role of Social Anxiety
Doing the right thing
The IoT Revolution
Adolescents’ online appearance preoccupation
Personality traits, friendship development patterns, perceived similarity, and well-being in mobile gaming communities
Emoji as Icebreakers? Emoji can signal distinct intentions in first time online interactions
Lonely and/or alone? A person-centred study of young adults’ childhood trauma, attachment orientations, and patterns of social media use
Differences in perceived online communication and disclosing e‐motions among adolescents and young adults
Are young people alone together
Social connections during physical isolation
The Power of a 😉
Online, offline, and beyond
Introduction to the special issue on communication technologies and relationships
With or without you
Does Thin-Ideal Internalization Increase Adolescent Girls' Problematic Social Media Use? The Role of Selfie-Related Behaviors and Friendship Quality
Precursors and Underlying Processes of Adolescents' Online Self-Disclosure
Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context
A Short-Form Measure of Loneliness
Cognitive Factors that Maintain Social Anxiety Disorder
The Relationship of Loneliness and Social Anxiety with Children's and Adolescents' Online Communication
The effects of Social Networking Site (SNS) use on college students’ friendship and well-being
A Meta-analytic Study of Predictors for Loneliness During Adolescence
Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being
Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction
Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety11Editor’s note
Social Anxiousness
Why people use social media
On the Outside Looking In
Loneliness over time
Social relations and life satisfaction
Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.
Social Anxiety Among Adolescents
Loneliness and Social Internet Use
Friendship Quality and Social Development
Measuring friendship quality in late adolescents and young adults
Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Computer-Mediated Communication
The Measure of Online Disinhibition (MOD)
Predictors of Internet Use
The Relationship Between Unwillingness-to-Communicate and Students’ Facebook Use
MySpace and Facebook
Attitudes Toward Online Social Connection and Self-Disclosure as Predictors of Facebook Communication and Relational Closeness
Connecting offline social competence to online peer interactions
Measuring Mobile Phone Use
The Importance of Friends
Beyond Baron and Kenny
Adolescent Loneliness and Social Skills
Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood
Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face
Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends
A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
The Online Disinhibition Effect
The revised Ucla Loneliness Scale
Friendships and adaptation in the life course
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 17 |