Beyond Good Intentions
Guidelines for Power-Conscious Gender Research by Men Academics
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3376306 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Matthew J Phillips (0000-0001-7908-5868) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 24 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/16094069251385440 |
| OpenAlex | W4414618843 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 61 |
Researchers who identify as men that conduct gender equity research in academic contexts face unique methodological and ethical challenges stemming from their positionality within institutional power structures. This paper presents a theoretically grounded framework for conducting power-conscious qualitative research across gender differences, drawing from both personal experience, and broader literature on feminist methodology, critical theory, and reflexive practice. Through critical examination of how gendered power dynamics manifests in academic settings, research relationships, and intersectional considerations, I develop four key guidelines for ethical research practice: (1) understanding gendered power structures and their effects in academia, (2) building equitable research relationships across power differentials, (3) conducting power-conscious interview practices, and (4) engaging in critical reflexivity about privilege and positionality. Rather than positioning these guidelines as exceptional practices, I argue they represent baseline ethical obligations for researchers working across significant structural power differentials. This framework contributes to methodological literature on conducting ethical research across gender differences while emphasising that power-conscious approaches and critical attention to researcher positionality should be understood as fundamental components of rigorous research design
Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict
Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers
The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Design
No Woman is Like a Man (in Academia)
‘Wasting talent’? Gender and the problematics of academic disenchantment and disengagement with leadership
Overview of Qualitative Research
Towards a social constructionist, criticalist, Foucauldian-informed qualitative research approach
The rules of the academic game
Qualitative Researchers' Conceptualizations of the Risks Inherent in Qualitative Interviews
Prenatal Care Use Among Women of Low Income
“Under Western Eyes” Revisited
Balancing safety and action
College men’s action for gender equality
Toward a trauma-informed qualitative research approach
Gender, vulnerabilities, and how the other becomes the otherer in academia
A symbolic violence approach to gender inequality in academia
Negotiating positionality, reflexivity and power relations in research on men and masculinities in Ghana
Feminism and theories of scientific knowledge
The rules of the game
Validity as intended
Men in Social Work
Allies Against Sexism
All we have to do, is do it all”
Why women build less effective networks than men
Racist Incident–Based Trauma
Mapping the Margins
Like Us, but Not Quite Us
Doing “male” diversity research in France
I'm an Academic, Now What
The Problem of Speaking for Others
Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology
I Look at You and See You Looking at Me
Feminist Theory
Situated Knowledges
The Qualitative Research Distress Protocol
Social Identity Map
When Participants Do Not Agree
Birds of a feather (don't always) flock together
The qualitative researcher
Ethics and positionality in qualitative research with vulnerable and marginal groups
Now I see it, now I don't
Writing the "Wrongs" of Fieldwork
Between Researcher and Researched
Reflections on Researcher Identity and Power
Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies
"Becoming a "Trusted Outsider
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |