The Sovereignless State and Locke's Language of Obligation

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3389428
AutoresJohn T Scott (0000-0003-4260-0090, University of California System, autor de correspondencia)
Año2000
Volumen94
Número3
Páginas547-561
Fecha de publicación2000-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2585830
OpenAlexW2019787311
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas11
Referencias citadas59

Modern liberal states are founded on individual rights and popular sovereignty. These doctrines are conceptually and historically intertwined but are in theoretical and practical tension. Locke's political theory is a source for proponents of both doctrines, and the same tension that runs through modern liberal thought and practice can be found in his theory. Rather than define the state in terms of a single sovereign authority, Locke constructs a sovereignless commonwealth with several coexisting claimants to supreme authority. He rejects sovereignty as what unifies the state, and he wants to replace the discourse of sovereignty theory with a language of obligation that will help bind together the sovereignless state. This language permits its adherents to articulate the reasonable basis and limits of political power. An understanding of Locke's sovereignless state helps us better comprehend the tensions embodied in discourses about individual natural rights, popular sovereignty, and governmental authority heard in the liberal state

Commonwealth · Law and economics · Obligation · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Popular sovereignty · Power (physics · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · State of nature · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought