The governmentalisation of personal digital archives in asylum procedures
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3608670 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ivan Josipovic (0000-0002-4404-3980, University of Vienna, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 51 |
| Número | 17 |
| Páginas | 4483-4501 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-10-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | New Community (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0047-9586 • E-ISSN: 1469-9451 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1369183x.2025.2492350 |
| OpenAlex | W4410718903 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 44 |
Asylum bureaucracies in Europe are undergoing processes of digitalisation, including the use of new digital data sources to inform decision-making in refugee status determination. The extraction of asylum seekers’ smartphone data, based on new policies across Europe, testifies to an intensified struggle for epistemic authority and reignites questions about the politics of knowledge production. The aim of this article is twofold. First, it demonstrates that the governmentalisation of digital archives predates formal policies for smartphone examinations. Drawing on empirical data from Austria, Germany and Switzerland, including court files, policy documents and expert interviews, the paper identifies the epistemic strategies deployed by asylum decision-makers in relation to smartphone data and discusses (dis)continuities in relation to the new policy-based procedures. Second, the article contributes to the literature on the politics of knowledge production in asylum governance by placing the findings into the context of Foucauldian governmentality studies. I argue that while the governmentalisation of personal digital archives reinforces well-established insecuritisation processes in asylum, it critically relies on a novel form of power, namely what Isin and Ruppert call ‘sensory power’
Criminology · Internet privacy · Media studies · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Data Analysis and Archiving · Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research · History
Epistemic Injustice
Taking the ‘Just’ Decision
Borders as Infrastructure
Rights of Passage
Epistemic Practices and Science Education
The Dynamics of Social Practice
The Politics of Insecurity
Producing Epistemologies of Ignorance in the Political Asylum Application Process 1
The Protection Paradox
Disproportionate Surveillance
The politics of big borders
Asylum as construction work
Persecution as Experience and Knowledge
Digitization Without Digital Evidence
Seeking Asylum in the Digital Era
What Can Data Justice Mean for Asylum Governance? The Case of Smartphone Data Extraction in Germany
Smartphones as personal digital archives? Recentring migrant authority as curating and storytelling subjects
The Policy Tools of Securitization
Governmentality
Security and Immigration
Biopolitics Multiple
The (in)securitization practices of the three universes of EU border control
Drawing Data Together
The birth of sensory power
What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally
States of Suspicion
Digital Evidence in Refugee Status Determination
Knowledge and legitimacy in asylum decision-making
Technologies, infrastructures and migrations
Les migrations à l'âge des nouvelles technologies
Digitalising Asylum Procedures
Data Matters
Epistemic domination by data extraction
Reinventing the politics of knowledge production in migration studies
Precarious migrants, migration regimes and digital technologies
Border/Control
How Infrastructures and Practices Shape Each Other
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research
The Politics of Credibility
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |