Actor-Networks in Political Moral Conflict
A Case Study of an Online Gun Control Debate
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3759475 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kristen L Cole (0000-0002-3024-3711, San Jose State University, autor de correspondencia), Marie C Haverfield (0000-0003-2949-0229, San Jose State University), Spencer Daniel Choate (San Jose State University) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 70 |
| Número | 7 |
| Páginas | 937-955 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-03-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00027642241240333 |
| OpenAlex | W4393002945 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 9 |
This research case study employs a theoretical and methodological framework of moral conflict theory informed by actor-network theory to better understand the sociomaterial entanglements-networks of human and non-human actors-that constitute political moral conflict. We analyze a case of moral conflict surrounding the issue of gun control, found within an online debate forum that was initiated by the question: should guns be banned in America? Through this case analysis, we identify key convergences and divergences in communication that facilitate coordination and cause incommensurability in conflict. These results reveal a new possibility for transcending political polarization through dialogue that attempts to account for the moral demands of objects
Control (management) · Criminology · Economics · Gun control · Gun violence · Medical emergency · Poison control · Political science · Political violence · Politics · Sociology · Suicide prevention · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |