Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Allocative Fairness

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4079573
AutoresGil Hersch (0000-0003-0992-0164, Virginia Tech), Thomas Rowe (0009-0003-0518-7118, London School of Economics and Political Science)
Año2025
Volumen20
Número5
Fecha de publicación2025-05-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/phc3.70042
OpenAlexW4410700646
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas78

Questions of fair allocation arise regularly throughout our lives, ranging from the trivial to the significant, for governments, private companies, associations, families, and friends. This article discusses the nature of allocative fairness, which is focused on the fair distribution of divisible and indivisible goods. The recent literature on allocative fairness takes John Broome's discussion of fairness as the proportional treatment of claims as its starting point. On this view, a claim is a reason why an individual ought to receive a good. This article discusses the nature of allocative fairness, claims, and goods. The most prominent allocative procedures in the literature are discussed, including equal allocation, equitable allocation, markets, lotteries, and queues

Allocative efficiency · Economics · Microeconomics · Chemistry · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Retributivism

    Mark D White•Retributivism•2011

  • Fair Division

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, Steven J Brams et al.•Fair Division•1996

  • The Luck of the Draw

    Peter Stone•The luck of the draw•2011

  • Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions

    Open Access•Govind Persad, Alan Wertheimer et al.•The Lancet•2009

  • Beyond Fairness and Deliberation

    David Estlund•Deliberative Democracy•1997

  • How Should We Aggregate Competing Claims?

    Alex Voorhoeve•Ethics•2014

  • To be fair

    Benjamin Curtis, B L Curtis•Analysis•2014

  • Egalitarianism Defended

    Larry S Temkin•Ethics•2003

  • Democratic Legitimacy

    Fabienne Peters, Fabienne Peter•Democratic legitimacy•2009

  • Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus

    George Klosko•Democratic Procedures and Liberal…•2004

  • Fairness

    Open Access•Brad Hooker•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2005

  • Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy

    Steven Wall•Oxford Studies in Political…•2025

  • V—Fairness

    John Broome•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•1991

  • A Theory of Justice

    Open Access•John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1999

  • Equality as Comparative Fairness

    Open Access•Larry S Temkin, Larry Temkin•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2017

  • Inequality

    Larry S Temkin•Inequality•1993

  • Moral Aggregation

    Iwao Hirose•Moral Aggregation•2014

  • Justice, Equality, Fairness, Desert, Rights, Free Will, Responsibility, and Luck1

    Larry S Temkin, Larry Temkin•Responsibility and distributive…•2011

  • Against tiebreaking arguments in priority setting

    Open Access•Borgar Jølstad, Erik Gustavsson•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • How to be absolutely fair Part II

    Open Access•Stefan Wintein, Conrad Heilmann•Economics and Philosophy•2024

  • How to be absolutely fair Part I

    Open Access•Stefan Wintein, Conrad Heilmann•Economics and Philosophy•2024

  • Good reasons for losers

    Open Access•Kai Spiekermann•Economics and Philosophy•2022

  • Procedural Fairness in Exchange Matching Systems

    Open Access•Gil Hersch•Journal of Business Ethics•2023

  • Fairness and close personal relationships

    Open Access•Charlotte Newey•Ratio•2022

  • First Come, First Served

    Tyler M John, Joseph Millum•Ethics•2020

  • Weighing Up Weighted Lotteries

    Gerard Vong•Ethics•2020

  • Weighted Lotteries and the Allocation of Scarce Medications for Covid‐19

    Open Access•Lynn A Jansen, Steven Wall•The Hastings Center Report•2021

  • Fairness Between Competing Claims

    Open Access•Ben Saunder, Ben Saunders•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2010

  • Perspectives on the Fairness of Lotteries

    Open Access•Jan-Willem Burgers•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2015

  • Why Lotteries Are Just

    Open Access•Peter Stone•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007

  • Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons

    Open Access•Alex Voorhoeve, Marc Fleurbaey•Utilitas•2012

  • On Fairness and Claims

    Open Access•Patrick Tomlin•Utilitas•2012

  • Aggregate Relevant Claims in Rescue Cases

    Open Access•JOHANNA PRIVITERA•Utilitas•2017

  • Fairness and the Strengths of Agents’ Claims

    Open Access•Nathaniel Sharadin•Utilitas•2016

  • Broome's Theory of Fairness and the Problem of Quantifying the Strengths of Claims

    Open Access•James Ravi Kirkpatrick, Nick Eastwood•Utilitas•2014

  • From Choice to Chance? Saving People, Fairness, and Lotteries

    Tim Henning•The Philosophical Review•2015

  • Kamm on Fairness

    John Broome, F M Kamm et al.•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1998

  • Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility

    John C Harsanyi•Journal of Political Economy•1955

  • Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking

    John C Harsanyi•Journal of Political Economy•1953

  • Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility

    Peter A Diamond, Peter Dia­mond•Journal of Political Economy•1967

  • Treating Broome Fairly

    Open Access•Christian Piller•Utilitas•2016

  • Needs, Moral Demands and Moral Theory

    Open Access•Soran Reader, Gillian Brock•Utilitas•2004

  • Broome on Fairness and Lotteries

    Open Access•Hugh Lazenby•Utilitas•2014

  • Interpersonal comparisons of well-being

    Open Access•Jelle De Boer•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2024

  • Saving Lives, Moral Theory, and the Claims of Individuals

    Open Access•Michael Otsuka•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2006

  • Just lotteries

    Open Access•Lewis A Kornhauser, Lawrence G Sager•Social Science Information•1988

  • Three arguments for lotteries

    Open Access•Peter Stone•Social Science Information•2010

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae