Bradley's Regress

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4079780
AutoresAnna‐sofia Maurin (0000-0002-1797-4245, Lund University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2012
Volumen7
Número11
Páginas794-807
Fecha de publicación2012-11-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00516.x
OpenAlexW2117179933
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas33

Ever since F. H. Bradley first formulated his (in)famous regress argument philosophers have been hard at work trying to refute it. The argument fails, it has been suggested, either because its conclusion just does not follow from its premises, or it fails because one or more of its premises should be given up. In this paper, the Bradleyan argument, as well as some of the many and varied reactions it has received, is scrutinized

Epistemology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Medicine · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science