Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Turtles All the Way Down

Regress, Priority and Fundamentality

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4351987
AutoresRoss P Cameron (0000-0002-0959-965X, University of Leeds, autor de correspondencia)
Año2007
Volumen0
Número0
Páginas070503042632004
Fecha de publicación2007-05-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.509.x
OpenAlexW1991306637
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas60
Referencias citadas3

I address an intuition commonly endorsed by metaphysicians, that there must be a fundamental layer of reality, i.e., that chains of ontological dependence must terminate: there cannot be turtles all the way down. I discuss applications of this intuition with reference to Bradley's regress, composition, realism about the mental and the cosmological argument. I discuss some arguments for the intuition, but argue that they are unconvincing. I conclude by making some suggestions for how the intuition should be argued for, and discussing the ramifications of giving the justification I think best

Epistemology · Intuition · Realism · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Buddhist Thought

    Open Access•John Spackman•Philosophy Compass•2012

  • Bradley's Regress

    Open Access•Anna‐sofia Maurin•Philosophy Compass•2012

  • By Our Bootstraps1

    Open Access•Karen Bennett•Philosophical Perspectives•2011

  • Shame and Contempt in Kant's Moral Theory

    Open Access•Krista K Thomason•Kantian Review•2013

  • Arguing against fundamentality

    Open Access•Kerry Mckenzie•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2011

  • Relativities of fundamentality

    Open Access•Kerry Mckenzie•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2017

  • Why the Good is supremely good

    Open Access•Christophe de Ray•Religious Studies•2022

  • Building the monarchy of the Father

    Open Access•Joshua R Sijuwade•Religious Studies•2022

  • If naturalism is true, then scientific explanation is impossible

    Open Access•Tomás Bogardus•Religious Studies•2023

  • The Radicalism of Truth‐insensitive Epistemology

    Open Access•John Turri•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2015

  • Metaphysical Foundationalism and the Principle of Sufficient Reason

    Open Access•Thomas Oberle•Dialogue•2022

  • The Teleological and Kalam Cosmological Arguments Revisited

    Open Access•Andrew Loke, Andrew Ter Ern Loke•The Teleological and Kalam…•2022

  • Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?

    C S Jenkins, Carrie Jenkins et al.•The Monist•2011

  • There must be a First

    Caleb M Cohoe, Caleb Cohoe•British Journal for the History…•2013

  • Fundamentality and Ontological Minimality

    Tuomas E Tahko•Reality and Its Structure•2018

  • Metaphysical Interdependence

    Naomi Thompson•Reality Making•2016

  • Structuralism in the Idiom of Determination

    Open Access•Kerry Mckenzie•The British Journal for the…•2020

  • The Logic of Leibniz's Borrowed Reality Argument

    Open Access•Stephen Puryear•The Philosophical Quarterly•2020

  • An unjustified orthodoxy

    Open Access•Justin Morton, Dan Kemp•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Priority and Particle Physics

    Kerry Mckenzie•The British Journal for the…•2014

  • The Deflationary Theory of Ontological Dependence

    Open Access•David Mark Kovacs•The Philosophical Quarterly•2018

  • El problema de la fundamentalidad para el panpsiquismo

    Open Access•Esteban Ortiz Medina•Critica•2025

  • Metaphysical Explanation

    Open Access•Andrew J Latham, Kristie Miller•Philosophies•2024

  • Janus-Faced Grounding

    Open Access•Charles Fruge•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2023

  • Individuating Powers

    Open Access•Lorenzo Azzano•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2023

  • Are Infinite Explanations Self-Explanatory

    Open Access•Alexandre Billon•Erkenntnis•2023

  • Metaphysical Foundationalism and Theoretical Unification

    Open Access•Anita Brenner•Erkenntnis•2023

  • Grounding and the Epistemic Regress Problem

    Open Access•Robert Weston Siscoe•Erkenntnis•2024

  • The Growing Block and What was Once Present

    Open Access•Pelin Tan•Erkenntnis•2022

  • Backing as Truthmaking

    Open Access•Alexios Stamatiadis-Bréhier•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2021

  • Paradox as a Guide to Ground

    Open Access•Martin Pleitz•Philosophy•2020

  • Should explanation be a guide to ground

    Open Access•Alexander Skiles, Kelly Trogdon•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • The harmony of grounding

    Open Access•Sherry Baron, Kristie Miller et al.•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Constitution and Dependence

    David Mark Kovacs, Journal Of Philosophy Inc•The Journal of Philosophy•2020

  • An argument for ontological nihilism

    Open Access•Jan Westerhoff•Inquiry•2024

  • Bradley's Regress and a Problem in Action Theory

    Open Access•Helen Steward•European Journal of Philosophy•2024

  • Dispositions and Dependence

    Open Access•Lisa Vogt•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2026

  • Priority, Existence and Fact Constituency

    Guido Imaguire•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2025

  • The emergence of ground

    Open Access•Michele Lubrano•Synthese•2021

  • Regress, unity, facts, and propositions

    Open Access•Matti Eklund•Synthese•2019

  • Fundamentality from grounding trees

    Open Access•Fabrice Correia•Synthese•2021

  • Grounding and a priori epistemology

    Open Access•Robert Weston Siscoe•Synthese•2021

  • An argument against Aristotelian universals

    Open Access•Damiano Costa•Synthese•2021

  • Towards a semantics for the artifactual theory of fiction and beyond

    Open Access•Matthieu Fontaine, Shahid Rahman•Synthese•2014

  • A Truthmaker Indispensability Argument

    Open Access•Sherry Baron•Synthese•2013

  • An account of truthmaking

    Open Access•Noël Blas Saenz•Synthese•2020

  • Grounding and dependence

    Open Access•Benjamin Schnieder•Synthese•2020

  • Tensed Facts and the Fittingness of our Attitudes 1

    Open Access•Kristie Miller•Philosophical Perspectives•2022

  • Fundamentality without Foundations

    Open Access•Michael J Raven•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2015

  • Upward Grounding

    Open Access•T Scott Dixon•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • Deep Platonism

    Open Access•Chad Carmichael•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2015

  • Normatively Enriched Moral Meta‐Semantics

    Open Access•Michael Rubin, Michael H Rubin•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2015

  • Intrinsicality and Grounding

    Open Access•Dan Marshall•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2013

  • Fundamentality in metaphysics and the philosophy of physics. Part I

    Open Access•Matteo Morganti•Philosophy Compass•2020

  • Metaphysical foundherentism

    Open Access•T Scott Dixon•Synthese•2023

  • Brutalist fundamentalism

    Open Access•Joaquim Giannotti•Synthese•2022

  • Naturalizing grounding

    Open Access•Amanda Bryant•Philosophy Compass•2018

  • Priority monism

    Open Access•Kelly Trogdon•Philosophy Compass•2017

  • Brute necessity

    Open Access•James Van Cleve•Philosophy Compass•2018

  • Ground

    Open Access•Michael J Raven•Philosophy Compass•2015

  • Essence and Modality

    Kit Fine•Philosophical Perspectives•1994

  • Bradley's Regress, The Copula and the Unity of the Proposition

    Richard Gaskins, Richard Gaskin•The Philosophical Quarterly•1995

Obras citantes distintas60
Citas por año4
Intervalo de citas2011 - 2026 (16)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 49
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae