Turtles All the Way Down
Regress, Priority and Fundamentality
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4351987 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ross P Cameron (0000-0002-0959-965X, University of Leeds, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2007 |
| Volumen | 0 |
| Número | 0 |
| Páginas | 070503042632004 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2007-05-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.509.x |
| OpenAlex | W1991306637 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 60 |
| Referencias citadas | 3 |
I address an intuition commonly endorsed by metaphysicians, that there must be a fundamental layer of reality, i.e., that chains of ontological dependence must terminate: there cannot be turtles all the way down. I discuss applications of this intuition with reference to Bradley's regress, composition, realism about the mental and the cosmological argument. I discuss some arguments for the intuition, but argue that they are unconvincing. I conclude by making some suggestions for how the intuition should be argued for, and discussing the ramifications of giving the justification I think best
Epistemology · Intuition · Realism · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Buddhist Thought
Bradley's Regress
By Our Bootstraps1
Shame and Contempt in Kant's Moral Theory
Arguing against fundamentality
Relativities of fundamentality
Why the Good is supremely good
Building the monarchy of the Father
If naturalism is true, then scientific explanation is impossible
The Radicalism of Truth‐insensitive Epistemology
Metaphysical Foundationalism and the Principle of Sufficient Reason
The Teleological and Kalam Cosmological Arguments Revisited
Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?
There must be a First
Fundamentality and Ontological Minimality
Metaphysical Interdependence
Structuralism in the Idiom of Determination
The Logic of Leibniz's Borrowed Reality Argument
An unjustified orthodoxy
Priority and Particle Physics
The Deflationary Theory of Ontological Dependence
El problema de la fundamentalidad para el panpsiquismo
Metaphysical Explanation
Janus-Faced Grounding
Individuating Powers
Are Infinite Explanations Self-Explanatory
Metaphysical Foundationalism and Theoretical Unification
Grounding and the Epistemic Regress Problem
The Growing Block and What was Once Present
Backing as Truthmaking
Paradox as a Guide to Ground
Should explanation be a guide to ground
The harmony of grounding
Constitution and Dependence
An argument for ontological nihilism
Bradley's Regress and a Problem in Action Theory
Dispositions and Dependence
Priority, Existence and Fact Constituency
The emergence of ground
Regress, unity, facts, and propositions
Fundamentality from grounding trees
Grounding and a priori epistemology
An argument against Aristotelian universals
Towards a semantics for the artifactual theory of fiction and beyond
A Truthmaker Indispensability Argument
An account of truthmaking
Grounding and dependence
Tensed Facts and the Fittingness of our Attitudes 1
Fundamentality without Foundations
Upward Grounding
Deep Platonism
Normatively Enriched Moral Meta‐Semantics
Intrinsicality and Grounding
Fundamentality in metaphysics and the philosophy of physics. Part I
Metaphysical foundherentism
Brutalist fundamentalism
Naturalizing grounding
Priority monism
Brute necessity
Ground
| Obras citantes distintas | 60 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 49 |