Framing of Majority and Minority Source Information in Persuasion
When and How Consensus Implies Correctness
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5339075 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gerd Bohner (0000-0002-0564-3625, Bielefeld University, autor de correspondencia), Amanda Dykema-Engblade, Amanda Dykema‐Engblade (Northeastern Illinois University), R Scott Tindale (0000-0003-4218-535X, Loyola University Chicago), Helen Meisenhelder (United States Air Force) |
| Año | 2008 |
| Volumen | 39 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 108-116 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2008-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1864-9335 • E-ISSN: 2151-2590 |
| Editorial | Hogrefe Publishing Group (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1027/1864-9335.39.2.108 |
| OpenAlex | W1901244321 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
| Referencias citadas | 22 |
Information about source consensus may either create expectancies of message validity that bias subsequent processing, or may determine the amount of message processing. The authors propose that which of the two effects occurs depends on the framing of consensus information. Undergraduates (N = 242) read strong, ambiguous, or weak arguments on an issue; the source was framed as either knowledgeable or similar to participants; source consensus was either low (minority) or high (majority). Dependent variables were the favorability of cognitive responses and postmessage attitudes. As predicted, knowledge framing caused consensus-based assimilation for ambiguous arguments, and contrast for both strong and weak arguments, whereas similarity framing caused extensive processing of minority arguments, but uncritical acceptance of majority arguments
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Framing effect · Information processing · Persuasion · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Attitudes and Attitude Change
Do People Actually “Listen to the Experts”? A Cautionary Note on Assuming Expert Credibility and Persuasiveness on Public Health Policy Advocacy
A Cognitive Toolbox for Persuasion. Perceived Diagnosticity and Persuasibility Bias of Persuasive Features
Degree of group consensus shapes perceived power structures and decision-process evaluations of groups
The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion
G(r)o(w)ing International
Decision biases and entrepreneurial finance
When Machine and Bandwagon Heuristics Compete
Differential impact of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of consensus and heterogeneity information
Persuasion by a Single Route
Levels of processing
Toward A Theory of Conversion Behavior
Differential contributions of majority and minority influence
The Interplay of Heuristic and Systematic Processing of Social Information
Minority influence
Situational Flexibility of In-Group-Related Attitudes
Majority versus minority influence
Heuristic processing of distinctiveness information in minority and majority influence
Influence of a Consistent Minority on the Responses of a Majority in a Color Perception Task
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment
Hidden impact of minorities
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,53 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2009 - 2024 (16) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 9 |