Towards Equal Rights in the Global Game? Fifa Strategy for Women's Football as a Tightly Bounded Institutional Innovation

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5771781
AutoresMichele Krech (0000-0002-6152-4954, New York Law School, autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen25
Número1
Páginas12-26
Fecha de publicación2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaTilburg Law Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2211-0046 • E-ISSN: 2211-2545
EditorialBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.5334/tilr.190
OpenAlexW3035846631
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas2

FIFA's recent (rhetorical) embrace of human rights prominently includes commitments to address gender discrimination and promote gender equality both on and off the pitch. What promise does FIFA's 'first-ever global strategy for women's football' hold as a means of fulfilling such commitments? A feminist institutionalist approach to this question offers insights into the bounded model of change endorsed by the Women's Football Strategy. It reveals that the Strategy's three key objectives serve as 'common carriers' for both long-standing institutional interests (in power, profit, and prestige) and newer institutional interests (in women footballers, women's football, and women in football governance). The assumption that these two sets of interests are mutually reinforcing is brought into question by exposing the ways in which FIFA's mainline institutional priorities, combined with certain structural features of football governance, blunt the reformist potential of the Women's Football Strategy. Bounded by old institutional features, the Strategy reflects a partial and incremental, rather than comprehensive and revolutionary, approach to addressing gender discrimination. FIFA's commitment to human rights therefore remains unfulfilled vis-à-vis women in football

Prestige · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Sports Analytics and Performance · Sports, Gender, and Society