Does virtue lead to status? Testing the moral virtue theory of status attainment
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6206984 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Feng Bai (0000-0002-5497-691X), Grace Ching Chi Ho (0000-0002-5722-1803), Jin Yan (0000-0001-8787-5472, Zhejiang University) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 118 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 501-531 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Editorial | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/pspi0000192 |
| PMID | 31107053 |
| OpenAlex | W2945331742 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 25 |
on Oct 24 2019 (see record 2019-63656-001). In the article "Does Virtue Lead to Status? Testing the Moral Virtue Theory of Status Attainment" by Feng Bai, Grace Ching Chi Ho, and Jin Yan, funding acknowledgments were omitted from the author note. The second paragraph of the author note should read as follows: This research was funded by an internal start-up grant (1-ZE74) awarded to Feng Bai from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University and a grant (NSFC 71572175) awarded to Jin Yan from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.] The authors perform one of the first empirical tests of the moral virtue theory of status attainment (MVT), a conceptual framework for showing that morality leads to status. Studies 1a to 1d are devoted to developing and validating a 15-item status attainment scale (SAS) to measure how virtue leads to admiration (virtue-admiration), how dominance leads to fear (dominance-fear), and how competence leads to respect (competence-respect). Studies 2a and 2b are an exploration of the nomological network and discriminant validity to show that peer-reported virtue-admiration is positively related to moral character and perceptions such as perceived warmth and unrelated to amoral constructs such as neuroticism. In addition, virtue-admiration mediates the positive effect of several self-reported moral character traits, such as moral identity-internalization, on status conferral. Study 3 supports the external validity of the virtue route to status in a sample of fulltime managers from China. In Study 4, a preregistered experiment, virtue evokes superior status while selfishness evokes inferior status. Perceivers who are high in moral character show stronger perceptions of superior status. Finally, Study 5, another preregistered experiment, shows that virtue leads to higher status through inducing virtue-admiration rather than competence-respect, even for incompetent actors. The findings provide initial support for MVT arguing that virtue is a distinct, third route to status. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
Admiration · Epistemology · Virtue · Personality Traits and Psychology · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Considering the role of second-order respect in individuals' deference to dominant actors
Strategic Exploitation by Higher-Status People Incurs Harsher Third-Party Punishment
Happy thoughts
When it is important to be more virtuous
Viva la evolution
Virtue Discounting
Status cues and moral judgment
The moral role models scale
Laughters Nurturing Tears for Leaders and Organizations
Examining the Effects of Interpersonal Competition on Employees’ Reporting of Unethical Behavior in Organizations
Are High-Hierarchy Individuals More Corrupt? The Interaction of Power and Two Forms of Status on Corruption
Receiving developmental idiosyncratic deals over time
How Can Women Take Advantage of the High-Tech Era to be Perceived as Effective Leaders? Being Tech-Savvy Helps
A four-dimensional model of Asian American stereotypes
A rising tide lifts all boats
When virtues are weaponized
Signaling virtuous victimhood as indicators of Dark Triad personalities
Theories of power
Up Close and Powerful
The relation between narcissism and aggression
Self‐other agreement and criterion‐related validity of moral pride and hubris
Emotional cues to group hierarchy
Two wrongs is what makes it more right
Does competence or morality mainly drive self-esteem? It depends on general system justification
To give or not to give? The influence of relative status and tie strength on feedback giving
| Obras citantes distintas | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4,17 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 24 |